期刊文献+

经尿道姑息性前列腺切除术联合内分泌治疗对晚期前列腺癌合并膀胱出口梗阻的疗效分析 被引量:10

The effects of palliative transurethral surgery combined with hormonal therapy for metastatic prostate cancer with bladder outlet obstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经尿道姑息性前列腺切除术对晚期前列腺癌合并膀胱出口梗阻患者的临床疗效及预后。方法将符合本研究要求的前列腺癌患者181例分为单纯内分泌治疗组(对照组)和经尿道姑息性前列腺切除术联合内分泌治疗组(手术组)。通过比较手术组术前、术后国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、最大尿流率(Qmax)、残余尿(PVR)和前列腺癌治疗功能评价量表(FACT-P)评分来评估短期疗效;通过两组间比较,分析经尿道姑息性前列腺切除术对晚期前列腺癌患者无进展生存期(PFS)及总生存期(OS)的影响结果纳入研究的181例患者中73例因膀胱梗阻或反复血尿而行经尿道前列腺电切或激光手术,108例为单纯内分泌治疗。两组患者的年龄、治疗前血清PSA浓度、治疗前前列腺体积、Gleason评分、基础疾病及基线FACT-P评分比较,差异无统计学意义。随访4~91个月,中位随访时间34个月。手术组术后1个月IPSS(12.74±3.43)、Qmax(18.23±2.26)ml/s、PVR(27.41±8.28)ml、FACT-P评分(124.33±14.00)与术前比较均有改善,且P<0.05。手术组治疗后PSA谷值较对照组低(1.77ng/ml vs 3.14ng/ml,P=0.000),手术组PSA PFS较对照组长(20.10个月vs 12.58个月,Log-rank P=0.002),手术组影像学PFS较对照组长(21.40个月vs 14.31个月,Log-rank P=0.004),差异均有统计学意义。手术组OS较对照组长(53.31个月vs 45.08个月,Log-rank P=0.028),差异有统计学意义。是否手术、治疗前血清PSA浓度、基线及治疗后FACT-P评分是总体生存率的独立影响因素。结论经尿道姑息性前列腺切除术联合内分泌治疗可有效改善晚期前列腺癌膀胱出口梗阻症状,并可延缓疾病进展、延长患者OS,是晚期前列腺癌合并膀胱出口梗阻的一种安全有效的治疗方法。 Objective To investigate the effects of palliative transurethral surgery combined with hormonal therapy in treatment of metastatic prostate cancer with bladder outlet obstruction(BOO). Methods One hundred and eighty-one patients with metastatic prostate cancer were divided into surgical group and control group.Clinical data of all the patients were analysised retrospectively.To assess the short-term effects of surgery by comparing the IPSS,Qmax,PVR and functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument(FACT-P)at baseline and after operation.To assess the long-term effects of the palliative transurethral surgery by comparison of PFS and OS between the two groups. Results One hundred and eighty-one patients were enrolled for further analysis.Among which,73 patient received transurethral surgery for a relief of BOO combined with maximum androgen blockade therapy.One hundred and eight patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy at the age of diagnosis.The medium follow up was 34 months(range 4-91 months).Between two groups,total PSA value,prostate volume,prostate biopsy Gleason score,complications and the base-line score of FACT-P had no statistic difference.In the surgical group,patients have better IPSS(12.74±3.43),Qmax(18.23±2.26)ml/s,PVR(27.41±8.28)ml,FACT-P(124.33±14.00)one month after the surgery than those at baseline(P〈0.05).Patients in the surgical group had a lower PSA nadir(1.77 ng/ml vs 3.14 ng/ml,in average,P=0.000),had longer time of PSA progression-free survival(PSA PFS)(20.10 months vs 12.58 months,Log-rank P=0.002),and had longer time of radiographic progression-free survival(rPFS)(21.40 months vs 14.31 months,Log-rank P=0.004).The surgical group also had a longer time of over survival(53.31 months vs 45.08 months,Log-rank P=0.028).Multiple variant regression analysis showed that the treatment method,total PSA and FACT-P score value were independent determinants for overall survival. Conclusions Palliative transurethral surgery combined with hormonal therapy can relieve BOO symptoms in patients with advanced prostate cancer.And it may delay the progression of the disease and prolong the OS.It is a safe and effective therapy for the patients with metastatic prostate cancer accompanied by BOO.
作者 姚裘 徐彭伟 阳东荣 YAO Qiu;XU Peng-wei;YANG Dong- tong(Department of Urology,Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou 215004,China)
出处 《现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志》 2018年第2期89-93,共5页 Journal of Contemporary Urologic and Reproductive Oncology
关键词 经尿道姑息性前列腺切除术 晚期前列腺癌 膀胱出口梗阻 Palliative transurethral surgery Metastatic Prostate Cancer Bladder outlet obstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1杨关天,姚茂银,杨建军,苑章,柳靖,霍明东,张晓文.TUVP联合TURP治疗合并膀胱出口梗阻的前列腺癌[J].中华男科学杂志,2005,11(7):523-525. 被引量:9
  • 2那彦群,李鸣.重视前列腺癌诊治规范化研究[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(45):3169-3169. 被引量:21
  • 3John WS. Expanding the definition of quality of life for prostate cancer. Cancer, 1993,71:1078-1082.
  • 4Peg E, Fei M, Gerald C, et al. Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapyprostate instrument. Urology, 1997, 50 : 920-928.
  • 5Jason RD, Frank JP, Jeffrey SG, et al. Sexual Functioning and quality of life after prostate cancer treatment: considering and sexual desire. Urology,2004, 63: 273-277.
  • 6Michael PO, Luts ED. QOL: alphabet soup or real concerns to aging men. Urology,2000, 56 Suppl 5A: 7-11.
  • 7Litwin MS, ShpaU AI, Dorey F, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in long-term survivors of advanced prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol, 1998,21 : 327-332.
  • 8Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al . The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 : a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst,1993, 85 : 365-376.
  • 9Gil YM-, Lorna K, Kristen R, et al. Quality of life at the end of life: trends in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Urology, 2002, 59 : 103-109.
  • 10Jennifer JD, Gerdi W, Ruth M, et al. Lifestyle and health-related quality of life of men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Urology,2006, 67 : 125-130.

共引文献116

同被引文献65

引证文献10

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部