期刊文献+

房地产税与健全地方税体系 被引量:13

Property Tax and Improving Local Tax System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 党的十八届三中全会要求"加快房地产税立法并适时推进改革"。房地产税通常是一种地方税,因而,其与地方税体系的健全很容易挂钩。党的十九大报告要求"深化税收制度改革,健全地方税体系"。税制改革需要与健全地方税体系联系起来。本文先分析地方主体税种的可能选择项,认为应当重新认识地方税,在此基础之上,才能为健全地方税体系提出相应的对策思路。考虑到房地产税开征的经济和社会影响,房地产税即使开征,短期内也难以成为地方的主体税种。现实的选择是进一步完善中国式分税制财政管理体制,通过加强中央和地方共享税体系建设,走一条具有中国特色的健全地方税体系的道路。 The 3 rd plenary session of the 18 th central committee of the communist demands us to "speed up the legislation of property tax and promote the reform when appropriate". Property tax is normally a local tax thus it's generally accepted that property tax is linked with the improvement of local tax system. The report issued by19 th CPC national congress requires us to " deepen tax system reform, improve local tax system". Tax system reform is linked with the improvement of local tax system construction. The thesis will first analyze the possible options of local tax types, re-consider the basis of local tax system, then present recommendations to improve local tax system. Considering the economic and social impact from the introduction of property tax, the tax will not be a major local tax type in the short term. The realistic option should be the improvement of China characteristic tax-sharing fiscal system. By improving the tax-sharing system construction between the central and local government, China will choose its own path to improve the local tax system.
作者 杨志勇 Yang Zhiyong
出处 《财政科学》 2018年第4期19-24,共6页 Fiscal Science
关键词 房地产税 地方税 分税制 财税改革 Property Tax Local Tax Tax-sharing System Fiscal and Tax Reform
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献38

  • 1杨卫华.适应分税制要求 完善地方税体系[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),1998,38(2):78-83. 被引量:2
  • 2安体富,王海勇.税权划分的国际比较与改革思路[J].经济研究参考,2006(58):24-31. 被引量:17
  • 3安体富,樊勇.对我国消费税改革的评析与展望[J].税务研究,2006(12):35-37. 被引量:32
  • 4.2001年中国统计年鉴[M].北京:中国统计出版社,2001..
  • 5(韩)林周.主要国家租税制度[M].汉城:韩国租税研究院,1996..
  • 6李万甫.中国经济转型期的税制建设[M].北京:中国税务出版社,1997..
  • 7.《中国统计年鉴》[M].,1983.323页.
  • 8吕冰洋.《税收分权与地方税系的建设》,《公共经济评论》第6卷第1期,中国财政经济出版社2010年版.
  • 9Ambrosiano, Maria Flavia and Massimo Bordignon, Normative Versus Positive Theories of Revenue Assignments in Federations,in Ehtisham Ahmad and Giorgio Brosio(eds). The Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, London.Elgar, 2006.
  • 10Bird,R. M. And Gendron,P. ,CVAT, VIVAT, and Dual VAT. vertical ' Sharing' and Interstate Trade. International Tax and Public Finance, 2000, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 753 - 761.

共引文献129

同被引文献229

引证文献13

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部