期刊文献+

中国学习者创造力与口头叙事任务表现的相关研究 被引量:3

A Study on Chinese EFL Learners’ Creativity and Oral Narrative Task Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本研究旨在探究中国学习者创造力与口头叙事任务语言产出的关系。通过对大二英语专业学生创造力测试和口头叙事录音的数据收集,我们对总体创造力及创造力的流利度、独创性、精准性三个维度与口头叙事任务语言产出话语量、复杂性、准确性、叙述结构四个方面进行了相关分析。结果发现:(1)学习者总体创造力与口头叙事任务的表现显著相关;(2)创造力的流利度和独创性与语言产出的准确性呈正相关,而话语量、语言的复杂性和叙事结构与创造力没有明显的相关关系。这些发现不仅加深了我们对创造力与叙事任务表现的关系的认识,还对外语教学中任务的设计和实施有启示作用。 The present study aims to investigate the relationship between creativity and oral narrative task performance by Chinese EFL learners. Data were collected from Chinese EFL learners' creativity test and oral narrative task, and correlation analyses on the data were conducted between the three dimensions of learners' creativity in the test and the four aspects of their linguistic performance on the narrative task. The analyses revealed the following results: (1) learners' overall creativity is positively correlated with their oral narrative task performance; (2) learners' creative fluency and originality are positively correlated with their linguistic accuracy of the narratives, but no correlation is found between learners' creativity and their discourse quantity, linguistic complexity and narrative structure. These findings can not only shed new light on the relationship between creativity and oral narrative task performance, but also have some implications on the design and implementation of tasks in foreign language teaching
出处 《中国外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第1期69-76,共8页 Foreign Languages in China
基金 国家社科项目“任务型教学与教师角色研究(13BYY082)”的部分研究成果
关键词 创造力 口头叙事任务 语言产出 相关性 creativity oral narrative task languageoutput correlation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献59

  • 1吴旭东.外语学习任务难易度确定原则[J].现代外语,1997,20(3). 被引量:48
  • 2夏纪梅,孔宪煇.“难题教学法”与“任务教学法”的理论依据及其模式比较[J].外语界,1998(4):34-40. 被引量:191
  • 3Bialystok, E. & M. Martin. 2004. Attention and inhibition in bilingual children: Evidence from the dimensional change card sort task [J]. Developmental Science 7: 325-339.
  • 4Bialystok, E. & D. Shapero. 2005. Ambiguous benefits: The effect of bilingualism on reversing ambiguous figures [J]. Developmental Science 8: 595-604.
  • 5Costa, A., M. Hernandez, J. Costa-Faidella &N. Sebastian-Galles. 2009. On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don't [J]. Cognition 113: 135-149.
  • 6Cummins, J. 1976. The influence of bilingualism on cognitive growth: A synthesis of research findings and explanatory hypotheses [J]. Working Papers on Bilingualisrn 9: 1-43.
  • 7Cushen, P. &J. Wiley. 2011. Aha! Voila! Eureka! Bilingualism and insightful problem solving [J]. Learning and Individual Differences 21 : 458-462.
  • 8Feist, G. 1998. A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity [J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2 : 290-309.
  • 9Feist, G. 1999. Personality in scientific and artistic creativity [A]. In R, Sternberg (ed.). Handbook of Creativity [C]. Cambridge: CUP. 273-296.
  • 10Fleith, D., J. Renzulli & K. Westberg. 2002. Effects of a creativity training program on divergent thinking abilities and self-concept in monolingual and bilingual classrooms [J]. Creativity Research Journal 14: 373-386.

共引文献19

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部