期刊文献+

床旁心脏超声联合被动抬腿试验在感染性休克患者容量反应性评估中的应用价值探讨 被引量:16

Application value of bedside cardiac ultrasound combined with passive leg raising test in the assessment of capacity reactivity in patients with septic shock
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨床旁心脏超声联合被动抬腿试验(PLR)在感染性休克患者容量反应性评估中的应用价值.方法 筛选在2015-10~2016-10期间河北北方学院附属第一医院收治的感染性休克患者61例作为研究对象,检测患者在平卧位时床旁心脏超声血流动力学指标,再先后对患者进行PLR和容量负荷试验(VE),并分别检测心脏超声血流动力学指标变化情况,对比分析有容量反应性组和无反应组的血流动力学指标.结果 61例患者中,29例有容量反应性,占全部患者47.54%(29/61).有反应性和无反应性两组患者在PLR和VE前的血流动力学基线值HR、MAP、CVP、SV和CO的组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);经PLR和VE后,两组间HR、MAP的变化微小,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组CVP均上升,与基线值相较,两组变化均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组SV值也较基线上升,但无反应组和基线比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),有反应组和基线比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且有反应组对应SV值高于无反应组(P<0.05);两组CO均较基线升高,但无反应组变化微小,与基线比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),有反应组和基线比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).Pearson相关性分析显示,PLR-ΔSV和扩容后ΔSV呈现正相关关系(r=0.812,P <0.05).结论 床旁心脏超声联合PLR用于感染性休克患者容量反应性评估效果较好,对临床液体治疗有一定的指导意义. Objective To discuss the application value of bedside cardiac ultrasound combined with passive leg raising (PLR) test in the assessment of capacity reactivity in patients with septic shock.Methods 61 patients with septic shock from October 2015 to October 2016 were objects of this study.Echocardiographic hemodynamic indices in horizontal position were detected.PLR and volume load test (VE) for patients were detected successively to detect the changes of echocardiographic hemodynamic indexes.The hemodynamic indices between the volume reactivity group and the nonreactive group were compared.Results 29 had capacity response in the 61 patients,accounting for 47.54% (29/61).The baseline values differences of hemodynamics HR,MAP,CVP,SV and CO before PLR and VE of reactivity group and non-reactivity group were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).After PLR and VE,the changes of HR and MAP between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).The two groups of CVP were all rising,compared with the baseline,the two groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05).The two groups of SV values were also higher than the baseline;compared with baseline data,there was no statistical difference in non-reactivity group (P > 0.05).Compared with baseline data,there was statistical difference in reactivity group (P < 0.05).The corresponding SV value in the reaction group was higher than that in the non-reactive group (P < 0.05).The two groups of CO were all higher than the baseline,but the changes in the non-reactivity group were not significant (P > 0.05).And compared with baseline data,there was statistical difference in reactivity group (P < 0.05).Pearson correlation analysis shows a positive correlation between PLR-ASV and dilatation of ASV (r =0.812,P < 0.05).Conclusion Bedside cardiac ultrasound combined with passive leg raising test can be used for capacity reactivity in patients with septic shock.Its application effect is better and has certain guiding significance for clinical liquid treatment.
作者 乔志飞 刘春艳 王磊 马琴琴 李树铁 王会娟 张丽骞 Qiao Zhi-fei;Liu Chun-yan;Wang Lei;Ma Qin-qin;Li Shu-tie;Wang Hui-juan;Zhang Li-qian(Intensive Care Unit, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, Chin)
出处 《中国急救医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第5期395-398,共4页 Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
基金 2015年张家口市科技计划项目(1521081D)
关键词 感染性休克 床旁心脏超声 被动抬腿试验(PLR) 容量反应性 容量负荷试验(VE) Septic shock Bedside cardiac ultrasound Passive leg raising test (PLR) Capacity reactivity Volume load test(VE)
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献58

  • 1郭卫东,付云.被动抬腿试验指导下补液对心脏术后患者血乳酸和脑钠肽的影响[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(11):2961-2962. 被引量:2
  • 2成人严重感染与感染性休克血流动力学监测及支持指南(草案)[J].中国危重病急救医学,2007,19(3):129-133. 被引量:87
  • 3Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012[J] . Intens Care Med, 2013, 39 (2): 165-228.
  • 4Monnet X, TeboulJL. Passive leg rising[J]. Inten Care Med, 2008, 34 (4): 659-663.
  • 5Rossow L, Yan H, Fahs CA, et al. Postexercise hypotension in an endurance-trained population of men and women following high?intensity interval and steady-state cycling[J]. AmJ Hypertens, 2010, 23 (4): 358-367.
  • 6Biais M, Vidil L, Sarrabay P, et al. Changes in stroke volume induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing patients: comparison between echocardiography and Vigileo/FloTrac device[J]. Crit Care, 2009, 13 (6): R195.
  • 7Dellinger RP, CarletJM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Intens Care Med, 2004, 30 (4): 536-555.
  • 8Michard F, TeboulJL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence[J]. Chest, 2002, 121 (5): 2000-2008.
  • 9Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge[J]. Crit Care Med, 2007 ,35 (1): 64-68.
  • 10Biais M, Nouette-Caulain K, Cottenceau V, et al. Uncalibrated pulse contour-deri ved stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation[J]. BrJ Anaesth, 2008,101 (6): 761-768.

共引文献133

同被引文献166

引证文献16

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部