期刊文献+

1909年北京学界公宴伯希和事件补考——兼论王国维与早期敦煌学 被引量:4

The 1909 Event of the Beijing Academia Banquet for Paul Pelliot:With a Discussion on Wang Guowei and the Early Stage of Dunhuang Studies
原文传递
导出
摘要 1909年北京学界于六国饭店公宴伯希和是早期敦煌学史上的一桩标志性事件,学者们对此多有考订。根据新公布的《江瀚日记》影印本,可确认公宴时间为1909年10月4日,另外此次公宴的参会人员有18人,包括王国维,此日记为考察王国维与早期敦煌学之间的学术因缘提供了珍贵史料。此次公宴原本具有双重意图,既有对外联络西方学者、推动敦煌文献刊布的目的,也有对内促成学部、京师大学堂的主事官员同意购买、保存劫余敦煌写卷的用意。 The event of the Beijing academia banquet for Paul Pelliot in 1909 is a landmark in the history of early Dunhuang Studies. The first man who discloses the list of scholars attending the banquet is Tanaka Keitaro, a Japanese bookseller. His diaries are the first hand literature in historical studies. Diary of Jiang Han released records of the event of the Beijing academia banquet for Paul Pelliot. The exact time is October 4th, 1909. It can be further confirmed that the date of the September 4th Tanaka Keitaro recording is wrong. It is especially valuable that Diary of Jiang Han records 18 people at the banquet. This is the largest number of records found so far and provides an important material for reexamining the nature and significance of the event from the perspective of the academic history. The foreign scholars who attended the banquet and were recorded by Diary of Jiang Han were the French Paul Pellio, and the American Fredrick McCormick. Dong Kang made academic contact with a stranger Paul Pelliot through the introduction of Fredrick McCormick. Investigating the identity of Chinese scholars attending the banquet, they were all incumbency officials from the Imperial Educational Ministry, the Imperial University of Peking and the Dali Court. The high officials from the Imperial Educational Ministry played an irreplaceable practical role in the banquet. The original intention of the banquet had a double purposes, one was to contact Western scholars to promote the publication of Dunhuang Literature, the other was to push the high officials from the Imperial Educational Ministry and the Imperial University of Peking to buy and protect Dunhuang Literature. The banquet not only succeeded in achieving the above goals, but also greatly improved the influence of Dunhuang Literature on the Chinese academia. This event directly promoted the rise of early Dunhuang Studies. Over all, Dong Kang and Luo Zhenyu played an important role in a series of activities before and after the banquet. They made a lot of efforts which had been fully recognized by the academia of Beijing, so they were elected to contact Paul Pelliot. They established a good connection with Paul Pelliot and laid the foundation for long-term cooperation. In addition, the most noticeable person attending the banquet was Wang Guowei. Diary of Jiang Han provides precious historical materials to the research of academic connections between Wang Guowei and the early Dunbuang Studies. Wang Guowei was an interpreter of the Imperial Educational Ministry. He met Paul Pelliot and attended the banquet through of help of Luo Zhenyu and Jiang Fu. Although Wang Guowei focused his studies on Ci and Qu, he laid the foundation for Dunhuang Studies and greatly deepened his understanding of Dunhuang Literature by assisting Luo Zhenyu in editing related books.
作者 秦桦林 Qin Hualin(Research Institute for Premodern Chinese History, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, Chin)
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期44-56,共13页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家社科基金青年项目(16CTQ017) 国家社科基金重大招标项目(17ZDA213)
关键词 敦煌学 《江瀚日记》 伯希和 王国维 Dunhuang Studies Diary of Jiang Han Paul Pelliot Wang Guowei
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献23

  • 1桑兵.伯希和与近代中国学术界[J].历史研究,1997(5):114-137. 被引量:21
  • 2许全胜.《沈曾植年谱长编》,北京:中华书局,2007年,第425-426页.
  • 3罗振玉.《敦煌石室书目及发见之原始》[J].东方杂志,1909,6(10):42-46.
  • 4罗振玉.《集蓼编》[A]..《雪堂自述》[C].南京:江苏人民出版社,1999年.第49页.
  • 5荣新江.《且渠安周碑》与高昌大凉政权[J].新药京不报:第5辑.北京:北京大学出版社,1998.
  • 6《恽毓鼎澄斋日记》,第2册,第555页.
  • 7《恽毓鼎致沈曾植札》,嘉兴博物馆编《函绵尺素——嘉兴博物馆馆藏文物·沈曾植往来信札》,北京:中华书局,2012年12月,第178-179页.
  • 8恽毓鼎著,史晓风整理《恽毓鼎澄斋日记》(国家清史编纂委员会·文献丛刊),杭州:浙江古籍出版社,2004年4月,第2册,第453-454页.
  • 9《为端为政之洋员得意》,《民呼日报》,1909年7月29日,第4版.
  • 10罗振玉.《敦煌石室书目及发见之原始》,北京:诵芬室,1909年10月,第1-8页.

共引文献30

同被引文献38

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部