施佩特和雅各布森学术渊源之对比研究

A Comparative Study of Shpet＇s and Jakobson＇s Academic Origins

本文尝试对施佩特和雅各布森的学术渊源进行对比研究，从诗性功能思想、言语交际理论和形式论三个方面进行探析。两人均强调艺术文本的诗性功能主导，并对言语交际的不同功能进行了区分。相对于雅各布森对形式论的偏爱，施佩特尤为关注艺术文本中“作者的声音”。两人在诗性功能和言语交际上的相似看法，体现了学术思想的传承和共鸣。两人在形式论上的彼此相左，凸显了各自不同的研究路径。

This paper carries out a comparative study of the philosophical thoughts of Gustav Shpet and Roman Jakobson, two renowned Russia philosophers, from three aspects： poetic function, oral communication and formalism. Both of them emphasize the dominance of poetic function in artistic texts and distinguish a variety of functions concerning oral communication; with Jakobson＇ s preference towards formalism, Shpet pays special attention to ＂author＇ s voice＂ in artistic texts. Sharing thoughts concerning poetic function and oral communication demonstrates academic heritage between Shpet and Jakobson while contradiction in the aspect of formalism highlights their respective research paths.