期刊文献+

腹腔镜下钩针法疝环闭合术治疗成人腹股沟斜疝90例临床观察 被引量:1

Clinical observation of laparoscopic surgery with the ring closure methods for 90 cases of adult indirect inguinal hernia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察腹腔镜下钩针法疝环闭合术治疗成人腹股沟斜疝的临床疗效。方法将180例成人腹股沟斜疝患者随机分为2组,各90例。对照组采用腹腔镜下经腹腔腹膜前间隙疝修补术治疗,治疗组采用腹腔镜下钩针法疝环闭合术治疗,观察并比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、住院费用、术后疼痛评分及术后并发症情况等。结果治疗组手术及术后住院时间明显缩短,术中出血量明显减少,住院费用及术后疼痛评分显著降低,与对照组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01);治疗组阴囊血肿或血清肿及切口感染直径明显小于对照组,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论腹腔镜下钩针法疝环闭合术治疗成人腹股沟斜疝安全可行,并且操作简单、并发症少、术后疼痛轻、恢复快、复发率低,具有一定的优越性,值得推广。 Objective To observe the clinical effect of laparoscopic crochet closure of the inguinal hernia in adults. Methods 180 adult patients with inguinal hernia were randomly divided into 2 groups,90 cases in each. The control group was treated with laparoscopic transperitoneal preperitoneal space hernia repair. The treatment group was treated with laparoscopic crochet ring closure. The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative hospital stay, hospital costs, postoperative pain score and postoperative complications were observed and compared between the two groups. Results The time of surgery and postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the treatment group. The amount of intraoperative blood loss was significantly reduced, hospitalization costs and pain scores were significantly reduced,and there was a significant difference between the treatment group and the control group (P〈0.05 or P〈0.01 ). The diameter of hematoma or seroma and wound infection was significantly smaller than that of the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups(P〈0.01). Conclusion Laparo- scopic crochet closure of the indirect inguinal hernia in adults is safe and feasible, and it is easy to operate,less complications, postoperative pain, rapid recovery, low recurrence rate. It has certain advantages and is worthy of promotion.
作者 李胜 杨文光 LI Sheng, YANG Wenguang(The Second Department of General Surgery, Jinchang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Jinchang, Gansu, 737100, Chin)
出处 《甘肃中医药大学学报》 2018年第2期66-69,共4页 Journal of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine
关键词 腹股沟斜疝 成人 钩针法 疝环闭合术 临床观察 inguinal hernia adult crochet hernia ring closure clinical observation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献137

  • 1王帆,陈杰,申英末,杨硕,刘素君,王明刚,孙立,朱熠林.同种异体脱细胞真皮基质补片在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的初步应用[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(17):5017-5021. 被引量:6
  • 2郜国均,张萍.聚丙烯平片修补腹股沟疝85例应用体会[J].中国药物经济学,2013,8(S3):103-104. 被引量:2
  • 3中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组.成人腹股沟疝、股疝和腹部手术切口疝手术治疗方案(2003年修订稿)[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(14):834-835. 被引量:629
  • 4Ferreira-Valente M A, Pais-Ribeiro J L, Jensen M P. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales [J]. Pain, 2011,152(10) : 2399-2404.
  • 5Herr K A, Spratt K, Mobily P R, et al. Pain intensity assessment in older adults: use of experimental pain to compare psychometric properties and usability of selected pain scales with younger adults [J]. Clin J Pain, 2004,20(4) :207-219.
  • 6Miro J, Castarlenas E, Huguet A. Evidence for the use of a numerical rating scale to assess the intensity of pediatric pain [J]. Eur J Pain, 2009, 13(10) : 1089-1095.
  • 7Miro J, Huguet A, Nieto R, et al. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and preference for a pain intensity scale for use with the elderly [J]. J Pain, 2005,6( 11 ) :727-735.
  • 8Breivik E K, Bjornsson G A, Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data [J]. Clin J Pain, 2000, 16( 1 ) :22-28.
  • 9Weber M, Schuz J, Kuball J, et al. Pain assessment in invasive diagnostic procedures. Comparison of an eleven-point numerical rating scale and a six-point verbal rating scale for pain measurement in bone marrow puncture [J]. Schmerz, 2005,19(6) :513-516,518-519.
  • 10Philip B K. Parametric statistics for evaluation of the visual analog scale [J]. Anesth Analg, 1990,71(6) :710.

共引文献1003

同被引文献10

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部