摘要
在"东亚新秩序"日本殖民语境下,"中国"言说大量涌现。由于朝鲜历史上是独立的国家,朝鲜文人并未真正将"中国"纳入"东亚"视野,仅是利用"中国"符号明确"朝鲜民族"的概念,重塑一个理想化的"朝鲜主体"。而台湾历史上是中国的一部分,台湾文人对"中国"表现出高度关注和连带意识,其背向帝国、明确民族立场的过程也正是确立对大陆的文化、血缘认同的过程,对他们而言,"中国"是与"日本"相对立的、本原的"自我",其想象的"台湾主体"先天包括"中国"这一更为本原的层面。由此看来,主张日本殖民统治末期萌生了自觉的"文化独立性"、要求政治独立的"台湾主体",是缺乏事实依据的。
A large number of discourses about China emerged on the background of ‘New Order in East Asia'. Korean intellectuals' ‘East Asia discourses' didn't focus on ‘China' because Korea was an independent country. They used‘China' to clarify the conception of‘Korean nation',and to reconstruct an ideal Korea. In the case of Taiwan,as a part of China,was very different from Korea. Taiwan Residents intellectuals' ‘East Asia discourses' included the consideration of ‘China'. When they were deviating from the empire and clarifying their national position,they were establishing their identity as Chinese. For Taiwan Residents intellectuals,‘China'was opposite to ‘Japan' and was their primitive ego,and their ideal ‘Taiwan' included ‘China' innately. Thus it can be seen that the views of ‘Taidu literature' is baseless.
出处
《福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期74-83,共10页
Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"二十世纪东亚抗日叙事文献整理与研究"(编号15ZDB090)
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"日本殖民统治末期(1937-1945)台湾与朝鲜抗日叙事比较研究"(编号16YJC751017)的阶段性成果