期刊文献+

汉族人群腭大孔解剖位置及其与腭穹隆形态关系的CBCT研究 被引量:6

Anatomical variation of the greater palatine foremen and its relationship with palatal vault morphology in Han population studied by CBCT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究汉族青年人群腭大孔解剖位置及其与腭穹窿形态的关系。方法:采用CBCT测量209名18~45岁汉族受试者腭大孔的相对位置及毗邻关系,并讨论腭穹窿形态对腭大孔位置的影响。结果:腭大孔在第三磨牙近中、腭侧和远中的分布率分别是17.22%、64.59%和18.18%。男性与女性腭大孔至腭中缝(GPF-MMS)的距离分别为(16.29±1.47)mm和(15.60±1.35)mm,腭大孔至牙槽嵴顶(GPF-AC)的距离为(14.02±2.69)mm和(12.29±2.41)mm。GPF-MMS的距离在腭高耸组中明显低于腭低平组;相反,GPF-AC的距离在腭高耸组中明显高于腭低平组。结论:汉族青年人群腭大孔的位置与患者腭穹隆形态和性别有关。 Objective: To investigate the anatomical variability of greater palatine foremen (GPF) and to explore the its relationship with palatal vault morphology in young HaM population. Methods: Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images of 209 patients aged 18 -45 years were measured. The relative locations of GPF were evaluated and its relationship with palate vault morphology was analyzed. Results: The distribution rates of GPF in the mesial, palatal and distal of third molar were 17.22% , 64.59% and 18.18% , respectively. In men and women, the mean distance between the GPF and the MMS (GPF-MMS) were ( 16.29 ± 1.47) mm and (15.60 ±1.35 ) mm while the mean distance between the GPF and the alveolar crest (GPF-AC) were (14.02 ± 2.69) mm and (12.29 ±2.41 ) mm, respectively. The GPF-MMS distance was significantly shorter in high-vauh group than that in low-vault group. In contrast, the GPF-AC distance was significantly longer in high-vauh group. Conclusion: The GPF position in young HaM population is related to the gender and the palatal vault morphology.
作者 薛绯 段晋瑜 张瑞 XUE Fei;DUAN Jinyu;ZHANG Rui(100034 Beijing, Department of Periodontology, Peking University Hospital of Stomatology First Clinical Division, China;Department of Stomatology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University)
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期364-367,共4页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 CBCT 腭穹隆 腭大孔 腭大神经血管束 腭中缝(MMS) 牙槽嵴顶(AC) Cone- beam computed tomography( CBCT) Palatal vault Greater palatine foramen Greater palatal neurovascular bundle Midline palatine suture (MMS) Alveolar ridge crest (AC)
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献24

  • 1叶静,王春玲,寇波,刘东旭,张凡,张本君.摆式矫治器与口外弓远中移动磨牙的疗效比较[J].上海口腔医学,2006,15(3):254-258. 被引量:10
  • 2KangS,LeeS,AhnS,etal.Bonethicknessofthepalatefororthodonticmini-implantanchorageinadults[J].AmJOrth-odDentofacialOrthop,2007,131(4Suppl):S74-81.
  • 3RyuJ,ParkJ,VuThiThuT,etal.Palatalbonethicknesscomparedwithcone-beamcomputedtomographyinadoles-centsandadultsformini-implantplacement[J].Am JOrthodDentofacialOrthop,2012,142(2):207-212.
  • 4KircelliB,Pekta爧Z,KircelliC.Maxillarymolardistaliza-tionwithabone-anchoredpendulum appliance[J].AngleOrthod,2006,76(4):650-659.
  • 5KinzingerG,GüldenN,YildizhanF,etal.Efficiencyofaskeletonizeddistaljetappliancesupportedbyminiscrewan-choragefornoncompliancemaxillarymolardistalization[J].AmJOrthodDentofacialOrthop,2009,136(4):578-586.
  • 6GraccoA,LombardoL,CozzaniM,etal.Quantitativecone-beamcomputedtomographyevaluationofpalatalbonethicknessfororthodonticminiscrewplacement[J].Am JOrthodDentofacialOrthop,2008,134(3):361-369.
  • 7GraccoA,LombardoL,CozzaniM,etal.Quantitativee-valuationwithCBCTofpalatalbonethicknessingrowingpa-tients[J].ProgOrthod,2006,7(2):164-174.
  • 8KimYH,YangSM,KimS,etal.Midpalatalminiscrewsfororthodonticanchorage:Factorsaffectingclinicalsuccess[J].AmJOrthodDentofacialOrthop,2010,137(1):66-72.
  • 9Seibert JL, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In : Lindhe J, ed[ M]. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. 2nd ed, Copenhangen, Denmark: Munksgaard, 1989: 477- 514.
  • 10Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Gingival biotype assessment in the eathetic zone: Visual versus direct measurement [ J ]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 2010, 30(3) :237 -243.

共引文献12

同被引文献24

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部