期刊文献+

切牙管与上颌中切牙牙根位置关系的CBCT研究 被引量:7

The relative position between incisive canal and the maxillary central incisors studied by CBCT
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:通过CBCT来探讨切牙管与上颌中切牙根的相对位置。方法:采用CBCT对40位骨性和牙性I类关系的成年人进行切牙管到上颌中切牙距离的测量。在轴向剖面上对3个水平面进行线性测量:(1)切牙管腭侧开口水平(L1),(2)切牙管腭侧开口与上颌中切牙根尖间的中间水平(L2),(3)上颌中切牙根尖的水平(L3)。结果:在L1和L2平面,切牙管宽度大于上颌中切牙牙根间距者分别有31例(77.5%)和18例(45.0%)。在L1、L2平面,中切牙牙根距切牙管的距离分别为(5.4±1.15)mm和(5.6±1.12)mm。结论:超过45%的患者切牙管宽度大于中切牙根间距。上颌中切牙牙根和切牙管之间的前后距离大约4.5~5.5 mm。 Objective: To study the relative position of incisive canal(IC) and maxillary central incisor roots using CBCT. Methods: CBCT images of 40 adults with skeletal and dental class I normal occlusion were included. Linear measurements were performed on the axial cross- sectional images corresponding to three levels : the palatal opening level of IC ( L1 ) , midlevel between the L1 and the root apex of the maxillary central incisors (L2) and the root apex level of the maxillary central incisors ( L3 ). Results: At levels L1 and L2, the IC width greater than the distance between 2 centrol incisor roots was found in 31 (77.5 % ) and 18 (45.0%) cases respectively, the anteroposterior distance between the maxillary incisor roots and the anterior boarder of the IC was (5.4 ± 1.15 ) mm and (5.6 ± 1.12) mm respectively. Conclusion : The anteroposterior distance between the maxillary central incisor roots and the IC is approximately 4.5 -5.5 mm. More than 45% of the adults have an incisive canal width greater than the interroot distance of central incisors.
作者 柯华峰 刘莉 苑子艺 刘冉冉 KE Huafeng;LIU Li;YUAN Ziyi;LIU Ranran(264001, Department of Orthodontics, Yantai Stomatological Hospital, China)
出处 《实用口腔医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期385-388,共4页 Journal of Practical Stomatology
关键词 切牙管 牙齿移动 上前牙内收 Incisive canal Tooth movement Maxillary central incisor retraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

  • 1Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM. A new protocol of the sliding me('hanics with micro-implant anchorage (M. I. A) [J]. Ko- rea J Orthod,2000,30(6) :677 - 685.
  • 2Park HS, Bae SM, Kyung HM, et al. Micro-implant anchorage for treatment of skeletal Class I bialveolar protrusion [J]. J Clin Orthod ,2001,35 (7) :417 - 422.
  • 3Kuroda S,Sugawara Y, Deguchi T,et al. Clinical use of mi- niscrew implants as orthodontic anchorage: Success rates andpostoperative discomfort [ J ]. Am J Orlhod Dentofacial Or- thop,2007,131(1) :9 - 15.
  • 4Park HS, Kwon TG, Sung JH. Nonextraclion treatment with microscrew implants [ J ]. Angle Orthod, 2004,74 (4) :539 - 549.
  • 5马绪臣,张祖燕.口腔颌而锥形束CT的临床应用[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:94-103.
  • 6Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants [J]. lnt J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008, 37 (4): 334- 340.
  • 7Park HS,l,ee YJ,Jeong SH,et al. Density of the alvedar and basal bones of tile maxilla and tile mandible[ J ]. Am J Orth- od Dentofacial Orthop, 2008,133 ( 1 ) : 30 - 37.
  • 8Park ttS, Kwon TG. Sliding mechanics with micro- screw im- plant anchorage [ J ]. Angle Othod, 2004,74 ( 5 ) : 703 - 710.
  • 9Chen YH, Chang HH, Chert Y J, et al. Root contaet during inserti<m of miniserews for orthodontic anchorage increases the failure rate: An animal study [ J ]. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2008,19( 1 ) :99 - 106.
  • 10Sung JH,Kyung HM ,Bae SM,et al. Microimolants in ortho- dontics [ M ]. Deagu, Korea : Dentos Inc ,2006:21.

共引文献9

同被引文献35

引证文献7

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部