期刊文献+

国际贸易中的“国家安全”审视——基于美国“232调查”的考察 被引量:34

“National Security” in International Trade——An Analysis of the US “232 Investigation”
原文传递
导出
摘要 当前,美国接连对华实施"232调查"和"301调查",使中美经贸关系经受考验。其中值得关注的是,美国依据其1962年《贸易扩张法》第232条,以保障"国家安全"为由,对自中国等WTO成员的进口钢铁和铝产品进行征税。回顾历史,美国在对外贸易中开展"232调查"并不常见。对此,中国进行了相应反制并就本案将美国起诉至WTO,本案涉及的焦点将是GATT下"安全例外"这一敏感条款的解释。为此,研究梳理了美国历年来"232调查"的历史实践,并从国际法角度分析美国"232调查"的合规性,特别是借助WTO规则的解释方法和已有判例,对"安全例外"进行了系统性分析。基于本案的研究,亦为后续处理中美经贸摩擦提供了路径和理论参考。 Recently,the US President Trump has initiated the "232 Investigation " and "301 Investigation" on China which pose great challenges to China-US economic and trade relationship. What is worth paying attention to is that the US President Trump announced an increase in tariffs on the imports of certain steel and aluminum on national security grounds pursuant to Section 232 of Trade Expansion Act of 1962. Most WTO members,including China,the EU and others,will be subject to the tariffs. However,the WTO-legality of the tariffs is highly controversial and will depend on whether they are justifiable under Article XXI of the GATT,known as the "national security"exception. This article reviews the US' application of Section 232 in the past and discusses the major legal elements of the "national security"exception based on the treaty interpretation and previous cases. It also offers recommendations on the approaches that China may take in response to the US' measures.China,as a responsible stakeholder and active defender of the multilateral trading system,should endeavor to utilize the WTO rules in dealing with the rise of protectionism of the US.
作者 彭德雷 周围欢 杨国华 PENG De-lei;ZHOU Wei -huan;YANG Guo-hua
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期91-104,共14页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 国家社科基金(14CFX05) 中国司法部(16SFB3044) 2017年中国法学会WTO法专项课题
关键词 中美经贸关系 国家安全 232调查 301调查 安全例外 China-US economic and trade relationship national security 232 Investigation 301 Investigation security exception
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献122

  • 1曾令良,陈卫东.论WTO一般例外条款(GATT第20条)与我国应有的对策[J].法学论坛,2001,16(4):32-49. 被引量:51
  • 2[3]United States-Trade Measures Affecting Nicaragua,GATT Document.L/6053(1986).
  • 3[4]参见Statement of the EEC Representative,GATT Doc.C/M157 at 10(1982).
  • 4[5]Decision Concerning Article XXI of the General Agreement,NOV.30,1982,GATT B.I.S.D.(29th Supplementary)(1983),at 23-24.
  • 5[8]GATT ANALYTICAL INDEX:GUIDE TO GATT LAW AND PRACTICE 600(Updated 6th ed.1995),at 604,600-605.
  • 6[9]United States-The Cuban Liberty and Democratic SolidarityAct,WT/DS 38/1(May 13,1996).
  • 7[10]Pub.L.No.104-114(1996),110 Stat 785,reprinted in 35 I.L.M.357.
  • 8[11]Request for the Establishment of a Panel by the European Communities on the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act,WT/DS 38/2(Oct 8,1996);WT/DSB/M/24(Minutes of Meeting of the DSB held on Oct 16,1996);WT/DSB/M26(Minutes of the Meeting of the DSB held on Nov 20,1996).
  • 9[12]Dispute Settlement Body,Minutes of Meeting Held on Oct.16,1996,WT/DSB/M/24(Nov.26,1996).
  • 10[13]参阅U.S.Says WTO Panel Not Competent to Judge Cuba Dispute,Hopes to Settle,14 Int'1 Trade Rep.(BNA),No.9,at 351(Feb.26,1997);US Vows to Boycott WTO Panel:Move Escalates Fight With European Union Doer Cuba Sanctions,WASH.POST,Feb.21,1997,at A1;David E.Sanger,U.S.Won't Of fer Trade Testimony on Cuba Embargo,N.Y.TIMES,Feb.21,1997,at A1.

共引文献41

同被引文献255

引证文献34

二级引证文献158

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部