期刊文献+

高变异药生物等效性研究中的样本量估计

Sample sizes of reference-scaled average bioequivalence for highly variable drugs: implementation of FDA approach
原文传递
导出
摘要 参比制剂校正的平均生物等效性(reference-scaled average bioequivalence,RSABE)是高变异药物生物等效性评价的重要方法。RSABE的等效性界值与参比制剂的个体内变异相关,其等效性界值是一个随机变量,因此无法通过双单侧检验的效能函数进行样本量估计。高变异药物RSABE的样本量估计目前尚无公认方法,本文结合实例介绍了平均生物等效性(ABE)和高变异药RSABE研究设计中对样本量的考虑和样本量的估计过程,为申办方和研究者进行生物等效性研究中提供参考。 Reference-scaled average bioequivalence(RSABE) is the preferred alternative approach of average bioequivalence(ABE) for highly variable drugs. As the bioequivalence limit of RSABE is scaled by intra-subject coefficient of variance(CV) which is a random variable,the limit is not a constant,so that the sample size calculations based on the power function of Schuirmann's two one-sided tests procedure is not applicable for RSABE approach recommended by FDA. Sample size was obtained by simulations in most current trials for highly variable drugs. Here the procedure of sample size estimation for ABE and RSABE was presented through examples to provide a reference to bioequivalence trials.
作者 于永沛 阎小妍 姚晨 夏结来 YU Yong-pei;YAN Xiao-yan;YAO Chen;XIA Jie-lai(College of Military Preventive Medicine, Medical University of the Air Force, Xi'an 710032, China;Peking University Clinical Research Institution, Beijing 100191, China;Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China)
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第9期1019-1024,共6页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基金 国家"重大新药创制"科技重大专项子课题:生物类似物质量参数可比性判定标准相关模型建立(2015ZX09501008-004)
关键词 高变异性药物 临床试验 生物等效性 样本量 参比制剂校正的平均生物等效性 highly variable drugs clinical trials bioequivalence sample size reference-scaled average bioequivalence
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献46

  • 1[2]FDA. Guidance for Industry: Statistical approaches to establishing bioequivalence[S]. Center for drug evaluation and research,food and administration, 2001
  • 2[3]Chow, SC, Liu JP. Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies [ M ]. Marcel Dekker, 2000: 57 - 78,303- 32
  • 3[4]Hyslop T, Hsuan F, Holder DJ. A small sample confidence interval approach to assess individual bioequivalence [ J]. Stat Med, 2000; 19(12) :2885 - 97
  • 4[5]Shein CC, Jun S, Hansheng W. Individual b ioequivalence testing under 2(3) designs[J]. Stat Medicine, 2002;21(2):629-48
  • 5[7]Chow SC, Shao J. Statistics in drug research[M]. New York:Marchel Dekker, Inc. Basel, 2002:107 - 46
  • 6BLUME HH, MIDHA KK. Bio-International 92, Conference on bioavai[ability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetic studies [J] . J Pharm Sci, 1993,82 ( 1 ) : 1186.
  • 7BLUMEHH, McGILVERAY IJ, MIDHA KK. Bio-international 94, Conference on bioavailability, bioequivalence and pharmaco- kinetic studies [ J ]. Eur J Phann Sci, 1995,3 (2) : 113.
  • 8SHAH VP,YACOBI A,BARR WH,et al. Evaluation of orally ad- ministered highly variable drugs and drug formulations [ J ]. Pharm Res,1996, 13( 11 ) :1590.
  • 9ANDERSON S, HAUCK WW. Consideration of individual bio- equivalence [ J ]. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm, 1990,18 (3) :259.
  • 10SCHALL R, WILLIAMS RL. Towards a practical strategy for as- sessing individual bioequivalence. Food and Drug Administration Individual Bioequivalence Working Group [ J ], J Pharmacokinet Biopharm, 1996,24 ( 1 ) : 133.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部