期刊文献+

不同年龄段健康国人肱骨头区域骨皮质区域性分布差异分析 被引量:1

Age-related changes in cortical bone material distribution in the humeral head region in healthy Chinese people using computed tomography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨不同年龄段健康人群肱骨头区的骨皮质区域性分布差异.方法 本研究共纳入健康志愿者51人,男27人,女24人;年龄20~88岁,平均48.69岁.所有健康志愿者行肩部CT扫描,按照年龄分为3组:A组(20~39岁)17人;B组(40~59岁)18人;C组(≥60岁)16人.应用骨皮质测量软件Stradwin 5.2读取CT原始影像数据,生成骨皮质的彩色分布图.垂直于肱骨头关节面,将肱骨头高度四等分后建立相互平行的3个横截面;在横断面1、2、3,测量分析肱骨头区前壁、外侧壁和后壁的骨皮质厚度、骨皮质密度和皮质下骨小梁密度.结果 在A组,骨皮质厚度和密度在肱骨头区前壁、外侧壁、后壁差异均有统计学意义(P值均〈0.01);在B、C组,骨皮质厚度和密度在肱骨头区前壁、外侧壁、后壁相似,差异均无统计学意义(P值均〉0.05).后壁的骨皮质厚度和密度在A、B、C组的横截面1、2中均较低.在C组的横截面3,外侧壁的骨皮质厚度和密度值最低.A、B、C组在横断面1、2、3中各个测量点的皮质下骨小梁密度差异均无统计学意义(P值均〉0.05).结论 在各个年龄段,肱骨头区的骨皮质区域性分布差异程度不同,40岁以后差异程度有所减弱.肱骨头区的外侧壁或者后壁,是骨皮质的薄弱区域. Objective To evaluate the cortical bone material distribution of the humeral head region in different-age groups.Methods Fifty one healthy volunteers who underwent computed tomography scanning on shoulder were included in this study, and were divided into 3 groups according to the age: group A (17 individuals, 20-39 years old), group B (18 individuals, 40-59 years old) and group C (16 individuals, ≥60 years old). Image analysis was performed on CT imaging data of these volunteers from Stradwin 5.2 software, a novel technique called cortical bone mapping, and the thickness maps for each proximal humerus were generated. Then three cross-sections (1, 2, 3 section) parallel to each other were established in the humeral head region. In the 1-3 sections, the cortical thickness (CTh), cortical mass surface density (CMSD), and endocortical trabecular bone mineral density (ECTD) in the anterior, lateral and posterior wall of the humeral head area were measured and analyzed.Results With regard to CTh and CMSD, there were significant differences among the anterior, lateral and posterior wall in the 3 cross-sections of group A (all P values〈0.01), while no difference was found in group B and C (all P values〉0.05). The CTh and CMSD of the posterior wall were the lowest in the cross-sections 1-2 among the 3 groups, and both parameters of the lateral wall were lowest in the cross-section 3 in the group C. There was no difference in ECTD data among different cortical locations in the three groups(all P values〉0.05).Conclusions There was significant regional variation of cortical bone material distribution in proximal humerus, and the degree of the regional variation decreased after the age of 40. Cortical bone material in posterior or lateral wall is structurally vulnerable.
作者 王烨明 李健 刘俊阳 田旭 杨建华 东靖明 Wang Yeming;Li jian;Liu Junyang;Tiang Xu;Yang Jianhua;Dong Jingming(Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin 300211, China)
出处 《中华解剖与临床杂志》 2018年第2期94-98,共5页 Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics
关键词 肱骨 肱骨头 骨皮质 骨小梁 骨密度 厚度 Humerus Head of humerus Cortical bone Bone trabecula Cortical mass surface density Thickness
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1郭德安,于铁链,段卫东,雷新玮,祁吉,温连庆.椎体小梁骨面积比值与QCT骨密度相关性研究[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,1999,5(1):35-39. 被引量:1
  • 2吴胜勇,杨立,祁吉,王斌,温连庆,李景学.骨质疏松老年妇女腰椎骨密度及结构的多层螺旋CT研究[J].中华放射学杂志,2005,39(11):1165-1170. 被引量:28
  • 3Genant HK, Engelke K, Fuerst T, et al. Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art. J Bone Miner Res, 1996, 11:707-730.
  • 4Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, et al. Comparisions of noninvasive bone mineral measurements on assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification. J Bone Miner Res, 1997, 12 : 697-711.
  • 5Steiger P, Block JE, Steiger S, et al. Spinal bone mineral density by quantitative computed tomography: effect of region of interest, vertebral level, and technique. Radiology, 1990, 175: 537-543.
  • 6Genant HK, Block JE, Steiger P, et al. Quantitative computed tomography in the assessment of osteoporosis//Genant HK. Osteoporosis update 1987. San Francisco: Radiology Research and Education Foundation, 1987:49-71.
  • 7Genant HK, Lang T, Fuerst T, et al. Treatment with raloxifene for 2 years increase vertebral bone mineral density as measured by volumetric quantitative computed tomography. Bone, 2004, 35 : 1164-1168.
  • 8Li W, Sode M, Saeed I, et al. Automated registration of hip and spine for longitudinal QCT studies: integration with 3D densitometric and structural analysis. Bone, 2006, 38: 273-279.
  • 9Lang TF, Guglielmi G, Van Kuijk C, et al. Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures. Bone, 2002, 30:247-250.
  • 10Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, et al. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int, 1995, 5 : 262-270.

共引文献28

同被引文献4

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部