期刊文献+

基本概率指派生成方法在高铁设备故障诊断中的应用研究 被引量:5

Application of Method to Determine Basic Probability Assignment in HSR Equipment Fault Diagnosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以高铁设备故障诊断为研究背景,提出一种基于样本证据距离和可信度函数的基本概率指派(BPA函数)的生成方法。根据所提出的概率赋值和传感器可信度生成方法,生成初始BPA。为了消除干扰影响,同时考虑证据冲突问题,引入冲突消解的方法,对初始BPA经过冲突阈值判别并进行相应的冲突消解。高速列车转向架故障诊断试验表明,所提出BPA生成的方法简单有效,能够处理冲突较大的数据。 Taking the fault diagnosis of high speed railway equipment as the research background, this paper presents a method to determine the basic probability assignment (BPA function) based on the distance and confidence function of sample evidence. According to the proposed methods to determine the probability assignment and the reliability of the sensor, the initial BPA is generated. In order to eliminate the influence of interference and consider the conflict of evidence at the same time, the method of conflict resolution is introduced. The initial BPA is judged by the conflict threshold and the corresponding conflict resolution is implemented. The fault diagnosis test of high speed train bogies shows that the proposed method for determining the BPA is simple and effective, and it can be used to handle data with major conflicts.
作者 朱菲 金炜东 ZHU Fei;JIN Weidong(School of Electrical Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu Sichuan 610031, China)
出处 《中国铁路》 2018年第4期82-85,97,共5页 China Railway
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(61134002)
关键词 故障诊断 DS理论 基本概率指派 BPA函数 故障分类 转向架 fault diagnosis DS theory basic probability assignment BPA function fault classification bogie
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献85

  • 1刘明,袁保宗,唐晓芳.证据理论k-NN规则中确定相似度参数的新方法[J].电子学报,2005,33(4):766-768. 被引量:8
  • 2邓勇,朱振福,钟山.基于证据理论的模糊信息融合及其在目标识别中的应用[J].航空学报,2005,26(6):754-758. 被引量:63
  • 3郭华伟,施文康,邓勇,陈智军.证据冲突:丢弃,发现或化解?[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(6):890-898. 被引量:55
  • 4ZADEH L. A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination[ J]. AI Magazine, 1986,7:85 - 90.
  • 5SMETS P. Belief functions: the disjunctive rule of combination and the generalized Bayesian theorem [ J ]. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1993, 9 (1) :1 -35.
  • 6SMETS P. The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model [ J ]. IEEE TransaCtions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1990:447 -458.
  • 7YAGER R R. On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules[ J ]. Information Sciences, 1987: 93 - 138.
  • 8LEFEVRE E, COLOT O, VANNOORENBERGHE P. Belief function combination and conflict management [ J ]. Information Fusion 2002,3 : 149 - 162.
  • 9MURPHY C. Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts [ J ]. Decision Support Systems ,2000 : 1 - 9.
  • 10SMETS P. Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions [ J ]. Information Fusion, 2007,8 ( 4 ) : 387 -412.

共引文献214

同被引文献30

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部