期刊文献+

无缝护理在腹腔镜直肠癌Miles术患者中的应用研究 被引量:1

Analysis of application effect of seamless care in rectal cancer patients with Miles surgery under laparoscope
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨无缝护理在腹腔镜下直肠癌Miles术患者中的应用效果。方法选择本院2014年5月—2017年5月收治的100例行腹腔镜下直肠癌Miles术的患者,随机分成无缝护理组、常规组,每组50例。结果无缝护理组在术后胃肠功能恢复时间、术后下床时间、进流质食物时间以及住院时间均低于常规组,无缝护理组在术前1天、术后10天心理上的焦虑状态明显轻于常规组,同样,两组患者在满意度方面也存在显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜下直肠癌Miles术患者采用无缝护理,可显著提高疗效,降低并发症的发生。 Objective To investigate the application effect of seamless care in rectal cancer patients with Miles surgery under laparoscope. Methods 100 cases of rectal cancer that were operated Miles surgery under laparoscope from May 2014 to May 2017,were selected and randomly divided into seamless care group and conventional group,50 cases in each group. Results Recovery time of postoperative gastrointestinal function,postoperative ambulation time,postoperative eating liquid food time and hospitalization time of seamless care group were lower than those of the conventional group. The anxiety Psychology of seamless care group on one day before surgery,ten days after operation significantly lower than the conventional group. At the same time,There was also significant difference in satisfaction between the two groups of patients(P 〈0. 05). Conclusions The application of seamless care in rectal cancer patients with Miles surgery under laparoscope can improve the clinical efficacy and reduce the incidence of complications.
作者 欧毅梅 蒋萍 Ou Yimei;et al(Operation Room, the First Affiliated Hospital Of BengBu Medical College, BengBu 233004, Chin)
出处 《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》 2018年第2期225-227,共3页 Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
关键词 腹腔镜 直肠癌 MILES 无缝护理 Laparoscope Rectal cancer Miles Seamless care
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1牟一平,杨鹏,严加费,陈其龙,袁晓明,朱玲华,徐晓武.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术的临床疗效评估[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):581-583. 被引量:83
  • 2腹腔镜结肠直肠癌根治手术操作指南(2006版)[J].外科理论与实践,2006,11(5):462-464. 被引量:272
  • 3The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group.A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer[J].N Engl J Med,2004,350(20):2 050-2 059.
  • 4Guillou PJ,Quirke P,Thorpe H,et al.Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial):multicentre,randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet,2005,365(9 472):1 718-1 726.
  • 5Fleshman J,Sargent DJ,Green E,et al.Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST study group trial[J].Ann Surg,2007,246(4):662-664.
  • 6Jayne DG,Guillou PJ,Thorpe H,et al.Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma:3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC trial group[J].J Clin Oncol,2007,25(21):3 061-3 068.
  • 7Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group,Buunen M,Veldkamp R,et al.Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2009,10(1):44-52.
  • 8Jayne DG,Thorpe HC,Copeland J,et al.Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,2010,97(11):1 638-1 645.
  • 9Kitano S,Kitajima M,Konishi F,et al.A multicenter study on laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan[J].Surg Endosc,2006,20(9):1 348-1 352.
  • 10Lacy AM,García-Valdecasas JC,Delgado S,et al.Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer:a randomised trial[J].Lancet,2002,359(9 325):2 224-2 229.

共引文献258

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部