期刊文献+

克拉玛依市乌尔禾区农田土壤重(类)金属污染特征及生态风险评价 被引量:2

Karamay Urho District Farmland Soil Heavy Metal (Metalloid) Pollution Characteristics and Ecological Risk Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以克拉玛依市乌尔禾区农田土壤为研究对象,在研究区共采集46个土壤样品,分析农田土壤中5种重(类)金属(Cd、Pb、Cr、As、Hg)的含量,分别采用单因子指数法、内梅罗指数法和潜在生态风险评价法评价农田土壤重(类)金属污染特征及生态风险。结果表明,研究区农田土壤样品Cd和Cr单因子污染指数均大于1,这两种重金属元素均存在一定的累积现象,其中Cd平均污染指数远高于Cr平均污染指数,累积趋势最为明显。内梅罗指数法显示土壤重(类)金属内梅罗污染指数平均值为3.19,属于重度污染。研究区农田土壤5种重(类)金属综合潜在生态风险指数处于低潜在生态风险的占45.65%,处于中等潜在生态风险的占54.35%。 A total of 46 soil samples were collected from farmland soils in Urho District of Karamay City,and the contents of 5 heavy metals(Cd,Pb,Cr,As,and Hg)in farmland soils were analyzed evaluation of heavy metal(metalloid)pollution characteristics and ecological risk of farmland soil was carried out by using the single factor index method,Nemerow index method and potential ecological risk assessment method,respectively.The results showed that the Cd and Cr single factor pollution index of farmland soil samples in the study area was greater than 1,and both of these heavy metal elements had a certain cumulative phenomenon.The Cd average pollution index was far higher than the Cr average pollution index,and the cumulative trend was most obvious.The Nemerow index method showed that Mere pollution index in soil heavy metals(metalloid)was 3.19 on average,belonging to severe polluted.In the study area,the comprehensive ecological risk index of 5 heavy metals(metalloid)in farmland soil was 45.65%in low potential ecological risk and 54.35%in medium potential ecological risk.
作者 郭星 蒋平安 颜安 李振华 单海斌 GUO Xing;JIANG Ping-an;YAN An;LI Zhen-hua;SHAN Hai-bin(College of Pratacultural and Environmental Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052,China;Environmental Protection Bureau of Urho District of Karamay City, Karamay 834000, China)
出处 《新疆农业大学学报》 CAS 北大核心 2017年第5期371-376,共6页 Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University
基金 新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发计划项目(2016B03041-1) 农业部"引进国际先进农业科学技术"项目(2016-X44)
关键词 农田土壤 重(类)金属 污染 生态风险评价 farmland soil heavy metal(metalloid) pollution ecological risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献209

共引文献467

同被引文献55

引证文献2

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部