摘要
从2013年欧盟对华光伏"双反"的价格限制到2017年的最低限价,我国采取了多手应对策略。首先,我国政府与欧盟多次沟通和协商,寻求政治和外交的解决途径;其次,光伏企业和行业协会积极应对;最后,采取反倾销的反制措施。但我方在应对过程中也存在一些不足,主要是部分企业违背承诺,诚信不足;反倾销反制措施效果有限以及政府对光伏产业引导和服务工作还不到位。面对国外"双反",政府、企业和行业应当积极应对,政府要做好引导工作,企业要注意分散风险,行业协会要积极协调,还要善于通过政治、外交和法律等多种手段进行对话、沟通和协商,尽最大努力维护自身权益。
From the EU's "Double reverse"price limit to Chinese photovoltaic enterprises in 2013 to the minimum price in 2017,China has adopted a multi-handed strategy.First of all,the Chinese government has communicated and negotiated with the European Union several times to seek political and diplomatic solutions.Secondly,the photovoltaic enterprises and industry associations have responded positively. Finally,anti-dumping retaliatory measures have been taken.However, we also have some shortcomings in the process of coping.The main reason is that some companies violate their commitments and lack of credibility and the effectiveness of anti-dumping retaliatory measures and the government's guidance and service to the photovoltaic industry are still not in place.In the face of foreign "Double reverse" measures, the government, enterprises, and industries should actively respond.The government should do a good job in guiding the work.The enterprise should pay attention to diversifying risks.The industry association should coordinate actively, and should be good at dialogue,communication and coordination through various means such as politics, diplomacy and law,and do the best to safeguard its own rights and interests.
出处
《价格理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第9期128-131,共4页
Price:Theory & Practice
基金
2017年重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费"科研创新能力提升专项"(人文社科项目:2017CDJSK08YJ11)
关键词
光伏
反倾销
反补贴
价格承诺
最低限价
Photovoltaic
Anti-dumping
Countervailing
Price commitment
Minimum price