期刊文献+

21世纪国际科学教育的论证研究新进展——基于CiteSpace可视化分析 被引量:5

Advance of Research about Argumentation in Science Education in the 21st:Based on the Visual Analysis of Citespace
下载PDF
导出
摘要 论证作为科学教育的核心元素在近些年得到越来越多的关注。运用CiteSpace V文献计量分析软件,对Web of Science数据库收录的六大国际科学教育核心期刊中有关论证研究的472篇文献进行分析,最终发现,国际科学教育论证研究自21世纪以来发展较快,以美国高校为首的科学教育研究单位和学者对论证进行了广而深的研究,形成了较为丰富的研究知识基础,论证研究热点覆盖论证话语研究、论证课程内容研究、论证教学模式研究以及论证能力评价研究。对国际科学教育论证研究的可视化分析,为推动我国科学教育论证研究提供了丰富的研究方法和科学的发展方向。 In this study,the software Citespace V was used to analyse 472 literatures from six core journals of international science education in the Web of Science database. It is found that research about argumentation in science education has been developing rapidly since 21 st century,and American universities and scholars have carried out extensive research on the argumentation which form a rich research knowledge base. The research hotspot includes argumentation discourse,argumentation instruction,and assessment of argumentation ability.Based on the visualization analysis of argumentation research,it provides a rich research methods and development direction for China to promote argumentation research in science education.
作者 董泽华 DONG Zehua(East China Normal University, Shanghai 20006)
机构地区 华东师范大学
出处 《现代教育管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期98-105,共8页 Modern Education Management
基金 教育部人文社会科学项目"基于学生核心素养的学校课程发展研究"(14YJC880120)
关键词 科学教育 论证研究 可视化分析 science education argumentation research visual analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献77

  • 1张玉柱.话轮与对话统一体浅析[J].外语学刊,1996(3):43-47. 被引量:7
  • 2McNeill,K.L.(2009).Teachers’Use of Curriculum to Sup-port Students in Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenom-ena[J].Science Education,93:233–268.
  • 3E.Michael Nussbaum.(2011).Argumentation,Dialogue Theo-ry,and Probability Modeling:Alternative Frameworks for Argu-mentation Research in Education[J].Educational Psychologist,46:2,84—106.
  • 4Rosalind Driver,Paul Newton,Jonathan Osborne.(2000).Establishing the Norms of Scientific Argumentation in Classrooms[J].Science Education,84:287–312.
  • 5National Research Council.(2011).A Framework for K-12Science Education:Practices,Crosscutting Concepts,and Core Ideas[M].Washington,DC:The National Academies Press,2-3,3-18.
  • 6Kuhn,D.,Iordanou,K.,Pease,M.,&Wirkala,C.(2008).Beyond control of variables:What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking?Cognitive Development,23:435-451.
  • 7Sibel Erduran·María Pilar Jiménez-Aleixandre.(2008).Ar-gumentation in science education:Perspectives from classroom-based research(Foreword)[M].Dordrecht,The Netherlands:Springer.ix–xv.
  • 8中华人民共和国教育部.科学课程(7-9年级)标准[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2001:12.
  • 9Christine Tippett.(2009).Argumentation:The Language of Sci-ence[J].Journal of Elementary Science Education,2009,21(1):17-25.
  • 10Acar Omer,Lutfullah Turkmen,and Anita Roychoudhury.(2010).Student Difficulties in Socio-scientific Argumentation and Decision-making Research Findings:Crossing the borders of two research lines[J].International Journal of Science Educa-tion,2010,32(9):1191—1206.

共引文献83

同被引文献21

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部