期刊文献+

最简群体范式的操作、心理机制及新应用 被引量:9

The Minimal Group Paradigm: Operation, Psychological Mechanism and New Application
下载PDF
导出
摘要 最简群体范式除经典任务程序、随机分配程序外,新近发展出想象程序、记忆程序、自我卷入、计算机模拟群体互动模式等分类操作。最简群体范式具有随机性、完全匿名性和无关自我功利性等特点,可以从群体推断自我、自我推断群体及社会认同整合三个视角解释其心理机制。目前,最简群体范式在社会认知加工、社会心理偏好、社会互动行为及神经生理反应等领域开始广泛应用。 The minimal group paradigm of social categorization provides a simple and effective tool for the intergroup relations research, which has been widely used by social psychologists. In addition to the classic task procedure, random assignment procedure, the minimal group paradigm developed the new classification operations such as imagination procedure, memorization procedure, self-involvement procedure and minimal group interaction paradigm etc. Classic task procedure, random assignment procedure, imagination procedure and memorization procedure can be used in the explicit measurement of minimal group effect. And the implicit minimal group effect, it is preferred to use the memorization procedure, while researchers should be cautious to the use of classic task procedure. Therefore, the researchers should choose the use of different minimal group paradigms according to their research purpose.In general, the new groups generated by the minimal group paradigm mainly include two types. One is the equal groups. In the early days, most of the new different groups produced by the minimal group paradigm were equal in terms of group status and group size. The other is unequal groups. Nowadays, the intergroup relations between groups with high-low or advantage-disadvantage status are gradually becoming the focus of relevent research. Furthermore, compared to the real social categorization, the minimal group paradigm has the characteristics of randomness, complete anonymity and unrelated self-interest. And the researchers are increasingly concerned with the authenticity of the task and response of minimal group paradigm. Initially, the dependent variable of the minimal group paradigm is the allocation behavior in the group distribution matrix. In general, the Tajfel matrix is used to assign different rewards to the participants. This classic matrix is used to measure how to select the different reward strategies for the members of ingroup and outgroup, including four strategies of Fairness(F), Maximum Difference(MD), Maximum Joint Profit(MJP) and Maximum Ingroup Profit(MIP). Recent research has shown that compared to the strategy of MIP, people tended to use the strategy of MD.The main effect of the minimal group paradigm is the ingroup favoritism, and the researchers interpret the psychological mechanism through group-inferring-self, self-inferring-group, and integrative model of social identification. Among them, the perspective of group-inferring-self includes positive self-esteem and self-stereotyping, and the perspective of self-interring-group is mainly from the explains of self-anchoring, self-projection and I-sharing. And integrative model of social identification provides a good integration of these two perspectives, which provides a new perspective for the dynamic interaction of personal self and social self. Relative to the perspective of group-inferring-self, the researchers provide more empirical support for self-inferring-group, but as to the precise psychological mechanism of the minimal group effect still need more empirical test.In addition to the intergroup bias research, the minimal group paradigm is widely used in social cognitive processing(such as face coding and recognition, etc.), psychological preference(such selective trust and positive traits evaluation, etc.), interaction behavior(such as effective communication, cooperation, punishment and loyalty behavior, etc.) and neurophysiological reactions(such as blood pressure, cardiovascular response and face temperature response, etc.).It is the main direction of future research to further examine the diverse procedures of the minimal group paradigm, to improve ecological validity, to explore the potential psychological mechanisms of the effects, and to strengthen the local inspection and cross-cultural research.
作者 温芳芳 佐斌 Wen Fangfang;Zuo Bin(School of Psychology, Research Center of Social Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 43007)
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期713-719,共7页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31571147、31400903) 华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费重大培育项目(CCNU15Z02001、CCNU14Z02015)的资助
关键词 最简群体范式 社会分类 操作 自我锚定 主我分享 minimal group paradigm social categorization operation self-anchoring I-sharing
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1方文.群体符号边界如何形成?——以北京基督新教群体为例[J].社会学研究,2005(1):25-59. 被引量:116
  • 2赵志裕,温静,谭俭邦.社会认同的基本心理历程——香港回归中国的研究范例[J].社会学研究,2005(5):202-227. 被引量:211
  • 3张阳阳,佐斌.自尊的恐惧管理理论研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(2):273-280. 被引量:53
  • 4Taylor S E,Peplau L A,Sears D O.谢冬梅谢晓非等译社会心理学(第十版).北京:北京大学出版社,2004:255-266.
  • 5Festinger L, Schachter S, Back K. Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1950.
  • 6Simpson J A, Rholea W S. (Eds.). Attachment theory and close relationships. New York: Guilford Press, 1994.
  • 7Pinel Elizabeth C, Long Anson E , Landau, Mar J, Alexander, Kira, Pyszczynski, Tom. Seeing I to I: A Pathway to Interpersonal Connectedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2004, 90(2): 243- 257.
  • 8Kupersmidt J B, DeRosier M E, Patterson C P. Similarity as the basis for children's friendships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1995,12 : 439 - 452.
  • 9Carli L L, Ganley R, Pierce--Otay A. Similarity and satisfaction in roommate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1991,17 : 419 - 426.
  • 10Schoen R, Wooldredge J. Marriage choices in North Carolina and Virginia, 1969 - 71 and1979 - 81. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1989,51:465 - 481.

共引文献673

同被引文献65

引证文献9

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部