期刊文献+

提高批判性思维教育质量的课程要求及其理论根基 被引量:2

Course Requirements for Improving the Quality of Critical Thinking Education and Its Theoretical Foundation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 批判性思维教育在国外深受欢迎,以批判性思维能力和气质培养为基本导向。但是,国内关于批判性思维教育的规模不够,在逻辑学和教育学界的相关努力中,长期存在"互不往来"的现象。问题的原因不在于双方对教育理念及课程的把握,而在于对批判性思维教育文化语境的重视不够。为此,提升批判性思维教育质量,应当接受一个文化整体性视界,重视逻辑学和认知心理学对批判性思维课程的理论支撑,并为此接受一个广义的逻辑观。 Critical thinking education, which is guided by critical thinking ability cultivation and quality,is very popular in foreign countries. However, the size of the domestic education about critical thinking educa-tion is not enough, and there has been a long-term confrontation between works from logic and education. Thecause of the problem lies not in their orientation of education idea or course, but that they do not pay enoughattention on the culture context presupposed by critical thinking education. Therefore, improving the quality ofcritical thinking education, we should accept a cultural integrity; attach great importance to the theoretical sup-port served by logic and cognitive psychology, and thus accept a broad view of logic.
作者 余军成 张存建 YU Jun-cheng;ZHANG Cun-jian(Center for Logic and Culture, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie, Guizhou 551700, China;Institute of Philosophy and Public Administration, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China)
出处 《贵州工程应用技术学院学报》 2018年第2期61-67,共7页 Journal of Guizhou University Of Engineering Science
基金 毕节市社会科学界联合会 贵州工程应用技术学院哲学社会科学联合基金青年项目"批判性思维及其教学研究" 项目编号:LXQN1702
关键词 批判性思维教育 课程 理论 逻辑 Critical Thinking Education Course Theory Logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献48

  • 1J.M.鲍亨斯基,王路.一位逻辑学家的回忆[J].世界哲学,1987(1):30-37. 被引量:7
  • 2王志敏,马计斌.浅析批判思考[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(1):114-117. 被引量:4
  • 3朱新秤.论大学生批判性思维特质培养[J].高教探索,2007(3):44-46. 被引量:21
  • 4JM鲍亨斯基.当代思维方法[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1987..
  • 5康德.纯粹理性批判[M].韦卓民译.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,2004.
  • 6D.Alan Bensley.心理学批判性思维[M].李小平等译.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2005.4.
  • 7[1]Gardner Lindzey. et al, Psychology. 2/e. New York :Worth Publishers. 1978. PP. 309-318.
  • 8[2]Richard Paul. ‘Critical Thinking: Basic Questions and Answers ' http ://www. sonoma.edu/cthink/
  • 9[3]Richard Paul. ‘Why student and Teachers Don't Reason Well ' http://www. sonoma. edu/cthink/
  • 10[4]David Hitchcock. ‘Do the Fallacies Have a Place in the Teaching of Reasoning Skills or critical Thinking?' in Fallacies:Classical and contemporary rdadings. Hanson and Robert CPinto. eds.University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. 1995. pp. 320-321.

共引文献74

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部