期刊文献+

镍钛器械分离对根管治疗预后影响临床研究 被引量:5

Impact of a retained instrument on outcome of endodontic treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估根管内留存的镍钛器械分离片段对根管治疗预后的影响。方法选取2011年1月至2013年3月南京大学医学院附属口腔医院牙体牙髓病科进行根管治疗发生镍钛器械分离且未取出患者40例,分析器械分离牙位、分离片段长度、分离片段位置、患牙临床诊断对根管治疗预后的影响。结果根管治愈率为80.0%,器械分离发生牙位与根管治疗预后无明显关系。牙髓炎组治愈率为84.6%,根尖周炎组治愈率为71.4%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论根管内留存镍钛器械分离片段对根管治疗预后无明显影响。 Objective To analyze the impact of a retained Ni-Tiinstrument on outcome of root canal treatment. Methods Forty teeth were collected at Nanjing Stomatology Hospital from January 2011 to March 2013. Information included tooth type,the length of separated fragments,the location of the fragments in root canal,the preoperative diagnosis and the outcome of these cases were collected. Results Overall,weighted mean healing for the teeth with a retained instrument fragment was 80.0%. Healing rate was 71.4% for the teeth suffering from apical inflammation before treatment and 84.6% for pulpitis. Conclusion The outcome of endodontic treatment when a separated fragment is left within root canal is not significantly reduced.
作者 王南南 丁梦 苗雷英 葛久禹 WANG Nan-nan;DING Meng;MIAO Lei-ying;GE Jiu-yu(Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China)
出处 《中国实用口腔科杂志》 CAS 2018年第2期88-90,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology
基金 国家重点专科建设项目(卫办医政函[2011]873号)
关键词 镍钛器械 器械分离 预后 NiTi instrument instrument separation outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献170

  • 1黄定明.根管治疗技术规范与疗效评价标准[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2004,22(3):196-197. 被引量:130
  • 2李升,张健,葛久禹.取根管内折断器械的并发症[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2007,34(1):27-29. 被引量:26
  • 3谭青松,彭彬,边专,樊明文.不同浓度次氯酸钠根管超声冲洗的实验研究[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(4):388-390. 被引量:23
  • 4Orstavik D, Ford TP. Essential endodontology. Apical periodontitis: microbial infection and host responses [ M]. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1988 : 1-8.
  • 5Haapasalo M, Shen Y, Ricucci D. Reasons for persistent and emerging post-treatment endodontic disease [ J ]. Endod Topics, 2008,18( 1 ) :31-50.
  • 6Friedman S, Abitbol S, Lawrence HP. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phase 1: initial treatment [ J ]. J Endod,2003,29(12) :787-793.
  • 7Wu MK, Shemesh H, Wesselink PR. Limitations of previously published systematic reviews evaluating the outcome of endodontic treatment [ J ]. Int Endod J ,2009,42 (8) :656-666.
  • 8Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, et al. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature: part 1. Effects of study characteristics on probability of success [ J ]. Int Endod J, 2007,40(12) :921-939.
  • 9van der Sluis LW, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. The evaluation of removal of calcium hydroxide paste from an artificial standardized groove in the apical root canal using different irrigation methodologies[J]. Int Endod J,2007,40( 1 ) :52-57.
  • 10Card S J, Sigurdsson A, Orstavik D, et al. The effectiveness of increased apical enlargement in reducing intracanal bacteria [ J ]. J Endod ,2002,28 ( 11 ) :779-783.

共引文献111

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部