期刊文献+

个体化疾病管理干预对肝硬化失代偿期患者服药信念和依从性的影响 被引量:23

Effect of individualized disease management intervention on the medication beliefs and complianceamong patients with decompensated cirrhosis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评估个体化疾病管理干预对肝硬化失代偿期患者服药信念和依从性的影响。方法 选择江苏省无锡市第二人民医院消化内科2016 年6 月—2017 年4 月肝硬化失代偿期患者64 例,随机分为干预组和对照组,每组32 例。干预组采用个体化疾病管理干预方法,对照组采用常规治疗护理及随访。采用服药信念特异性问卷(BMQ)和Morisky 用药依从性问卷(MMAS)分别在干预前、干预 3 个月后进行评估,比较两组干预效果。结果 干预3 个月后,干预组患者BMQ(13.23±4.67)分、MMAS (7.38±1.86)分,较干预前提高,差异有统计学意义(t值分别为4.213、5.050;P< 0.05)。干预后,对照组患者BMQ(10.48±4.32)分、MMAS(5.78±2.01)分,均低于干预组,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t值分别为2.445、3.305;P< 0.05)。结论 个体化疾病管理干预能够提高肝硬化失代偿期患者服药信念,改善其服药依从性。 Objective To evaluate the effect of individualized disease management intervention on the medication beliefs and compliance among patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Methods A total of 64 patients with decompensated cirrhosis in Department of Gastroenterology in Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital from June 2016 to April 2017 were randomly divided into the intervention group and the control group, 32 cases respectively. Patients in the intervention group received individualized disease management, while patients in the control group received conventional treatment, nursing and follow-up. The Belief about Medicines Questionnaire-Specific( BMQ) and the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale( MMAS) were used to compare the interventional effect between two groups before and three months after the intervention. Results Three months after the intervention, BMQ( 13.23±4.67) and MMAS( 7.38±1.86) scores in the intervention group were significantly higher than those before the intervention( t=4.213, 5.050; P〈 0.05). After the intervention, scores of BMQ( 10.48±4.32) and MMAS( 5.78±2.01) in the control group were significantly lower than those in the intervention group( t=2.445, 3.305; P〈 0.05). Conclusions Individualized disease management intervention can improve the medication beliefs and compliance of patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis.
作者 许芳 吴海珍 Xu Fang;Wu Haizhen(Department of Gastroenterology, Wuxi No.2 People's Hospital, Jiangsu Province, Wuxi 214002, China)
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2018年第12期1457-1460,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 肝硬化 药物治疗依从性 服药信念 个体化疾病管理 Liver cirrhosis Medication compliance Medication beliefs Individualized diseasemanagement
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1张楚莹,谢少花,李悦侬,李作彬.汕头市澄海区2型糖尿病患者服药依从性调查[J].中国临床康复,2005,9(7):14-15. 被引量:6
  • 2许卫华,王奇,梁伟雄.慢性疾病患者治疗依从性的测量[J].中国行为医学科学,2007,16(8):763-764. 被引量:40
  • 3朱熊兆,姚树桥,王湘,等译.健康心理学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:4646.400-408.
  • 4Fisher LD, Dixon DO, Herson J, et al. Intention to treat in clinical trials. In: Pearce KE, ed. Statistical issues in drug research and development. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1990 :331-350.
  • 5Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Intention-to-treat principle. CMAJ 2001 ; 165 : 1339-1341.
  • 6Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomized controlled trims.BMJ 1999; 319:670-674.
  • 7Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT Statement:revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001; 285 (15) :1987-1991.
  • 8Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Cook DJ. User's guides to the medical literature. 2. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. A. Are the results of the study valid? JAMA 1993;270 : 2598-2601.
  • 9Pocock SJ. Clinical trials: A practical approach. 1st edition.Chiehester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England, 1983 : 176-186.
  • 10Huwiler -Muntener K, Juni P, Junker C, et al. Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodological quality. JAMA 2002 ;287 : 2801-2804.

共引文献166

同被引文献206

引证文献23

二级引证文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部