期刊文献+

PiCCO监测指导脓毒症并发急性肾损伤患者容量治疗的效果 被引量:14

Efficacy of PiCCO monitoring in guiding volume therapy in patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价脉搏指示连续心排血量(PiCCO)监测指导脓毒症并发急性肾损伤患者容量治疗的价值。方法脓毒症并发急性肾损伤患者85例,按是否采用PiCCO监测指导容量治疗,分为PiCCO组(n=37)和常规组(n=48)。记录容量治疗6和24 h时血流动力学指标、液体量、血管活性药物用量、肾功能情况及ICU病死情况、28 d病死情况。结果与常规组比较,PiCCO组容量治疗24 h时复苏液体量、容量治疗6和24 h时CVP降低,持续肾脏替代治疗时间缩短,尿量增多,血肌酐水平下降,ICU病死率、28 d病死率明显降低(P〈0.05)。结论对脓毒症合并急性肾损伤患者而言,采用PiCCO监测可合理地指导容量治疗,有助于改善预后。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) monitoring in guiding volume therapy in patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury.Methods Eighty-five patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury were divided into PiCCO group (n=37) and routine group (n=48) according to whether PiCCO monitoring was used to guide volume therapy.The hemodynamic parameters at 6 and 24 h after volume therapy, fluid volume, consumption of vasoactive drugs, renal function, fatality in intensive care unit and 28-day fatality were recorded.Results Compared with routine group, the volume of fluid for resuscitation at 24 h after volume therapy, and central venous pressure were significantly decreased (P〈0.05), the time of continuous renal replacement therapy was shortened, the urine volume was increased, the blood creatinine level was decreased, and the fatality rate in intensive care unit and 28-day fatality rate were decreased in group PiCCO (P〈0.05).Conclusion For the patients with sepsis complicated with acute kidney injury, PiCCO monitoring can reasonably guide volume therapy and is helpful in improving the prognosis.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期359-362,共4页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基金 浙江省自然科学基金(Y13H150009)
关键词 心排血量 导管术 Swan—Ganz 监测 生理学 脓毒症 补液疗法 急性肾损伤 Cardiac output Catheterization Swan-Ganz Monitoring physiologic Sepsis Fluid therapy Acute kidney injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献25

  • 1I-Ioste EA, Schurgers M. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury: how big is the problem? Crit Care Med, 2008,36 (4 Suppl) : S146- 151.
  • 2Ostermann M, Chang RW. Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE. Crit Care Med, 2007,35 : 1837- 1843.
  • 3Schrier RW, Wang W. Acute renal failure and sepsis. N Engl J Med ,2004,351 : 159-169.
  • 4Bagshaw SM, George C, Bellomo R, et al. Early acute kidney injury and sepsis: a muhicentre evaluation. Crit Care, 2008,12: R47.
  • 5Lameire N, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R. Acute renal failure. Lancet ,2005 ,B65:417-430.
  • 6Rabb H. Immune modulation of acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol,2006,17:604-606.
  • 7Langenberg C, Wan L, Egi M, et al. Renal blood flow in experimental septic acute renal failure. Kidney Int ,2006,69:1996- 2002.
  • 8Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care,2007,11 :R31.
  • 9Bellomo R, Kellum JA, Bagshaw SM. Normotensive ischemic acute renal failure. N Engl J Med ,2007,357:2205.
  • 10Deruddre S, Cheisson G, Mazoit JX, et al. Renal arterial resistance in septic shock: effects of increasing mean arterial pressure with norepinephrine on the renal resistive index assessed with Doppler ttltrasonography. Intensive Care Med ,2007,33 : 1557-1562.

共引文献36

同被引文献157

引证文献14

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部