期刊文献+

不同麻醉方式在剖宫产术中的应用比较 被引量:12

Different anesthetic techniques in cesarean section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察和比较腹横肌平面阻滞复合七氟醚全麻与腰硬联合麻醉对剖宫产手术产妇血流动力学影响及麻醉实施时间、产科医师及产妇满意度。方法选择拟行剖宫产的足月妊娠产妇60例,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,分为腹横肌平面阻滞联合七氟醚全麻组(T组)和腰硬联合麻醉组(C组),每组30例。T组产妇采用双侧腹横肌平面阻滞后,七氟醚吸入诱导插入喉罩;C组产妇采用椎管内麻醉。记录麻醉前(T1)、麻醉后2 min(T2)、切皮时(T3)、娩出胎儿后5 min(T4)、手术结束(T5)各时点产妇心率(HR)、平均动脉压(MAP)的变化,记录麻醉实施时间、产科医师及产妇满意度、术中出血量及新生儿Apgar评分。结果组内比较,T组术中HR、MAP变化与麻醉前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);C组产妇T2时HR升高,MAP下降,T4时MAP升高(P<0.05);组间比较,T组产妇T2时点HR低于C组,T2、T3时点MAP高于C组(P<0.05);两组新生儿Apgar评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。麻醉实施所需时间T组较C组明显缩短(P<0.05),产科医师满意度及产妇满意度T组高于C组(P<0.05)。结论腹横肌平面阻滞联合七氟醚全麻对产妇血流动力学及胎儿影响小,麻醉时间明显缩短,产科医师与产妇满意度高,可安全应用于剖宫产。 Objective To observe and compare haemodynamics,anesthesia time and satisfaction of obstetricians and in cesarean section parturients among transversus abdominis plane block combined sevoflurane general anesthesia and combined spinal and epidural analgesia. Methods Sixty full-term pregnant women( ASA Ⅰ-Ⅱ) were divided to transversus abdominis plane block combined sevoflurane general anesthesia group( Group T,n = 30) and combined spinal and epidural analgesia group( Group C,n = 30). Parturients received sevoflurane inhalation after bilateral transversus abdominis plane block in Group T,and those in Group C received intraspinal anesthesia. Heart rates( HR) and mean arterial pressure( MAP) were recorded before anesthesia( T1),2 min after anesthesia( T2),at skin incision( T3),5 min after delivery( T4) and at the end of surgery( T5). Moreover,anesthesia time,satisfaction of obstetricians and parturients,intraoperative blood loss and neonatal Apgar score were recorded. Results There were no significant differences in HR or MAP before and after anesthesia in Group T( P〉 0. 05). Compared with baseline,HR was significantly higher and MAP was significantly lower at T2 in Group C,but MAP was significantly increased at T4( P〈 0. 05). In Group T,HR was significantly lower at T2,and MAP was significantly higher at T2 and T3,compared to those in Group C( P〈 0. 05).There were no significant differences in Apgar score between the two groups( P 〉 0. 05). Anesthesia time was shorter and satisfaction of obstetricians and parturients were significantly higher in Group T group than Group C( P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion Transversus abdominis plane block combined sevoflurane general anesthesia influences little haemodynamics of parturients and fetus,provides shorter anesthesia time,higher satisfaction of obstetricians and parturients.
作者 刘世乐 刘晓磊 陈志强 骆成磊 张奕文 邢祖民 LIU Shi - le;LIU Xiao - lei;CHEN Zhi - qiang;LUO Cheng - lei;ZHANG Yi -wen;XING Zu - min.(Department of Anesthesiology, Shunde Hospital of Southern Medical University ( The First People's Hospital of Shunde District, Foshan ) , Foshan 528300, Guangdong, Chin)
出处 《广东医学》 CAS 2018年第9期1283-1286,共4页 Guangdong Medical Journal
基金 佛山市医学类科技攻关项目(编号:2016AB003723) 佛山市十三五重点专科和特色专科建设项目(编号:FSZDZK135049) 中华医学会临床医学科研专项资金-默沙东肌松研究项目(编号:13081240509)
关键词 腹横肌平面阻滞 七氟醚 剖宫产 血流动力学 APGAR评分 transversus abdominis plane block sevoflurane cesarean section haemodynamics Apgar score
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献32

  • 1黄燕娟.妊娠合并HELLP综合征剖宫产术的麻醉处理[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(9):652-653. 被引量:10
  • 2倪卫国,钟泰迪.不同靶浓度瑞芬太尼对腹部手术患者七氟醚MACBAR的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(7):588-590. 被引量:28
  • 3Brazelton TB,ed.Neonatal behavioral assessment scale.Clinics in developmental medicine.2nd.London:Blackwell,1984.88-125.
  • 4Scanlon JW,Brown WU,Weiss JB,et al.Neurobehavioral responses of newborn infants after maternal epidural anesthesia.Anesthesiology,1974,40:121-128.
  • 5Amiel-Tison C,Barrier G,Shnider SM,et al.A new neurologic and adaptive capacity scoring system for evaluating obstetric medications in full-term newborns.Anesthesiology,1982,56:340-350.
  • 6Hein HAT,Putman JM.Is propofol a proper proposition for reproductive procedures.J Clin Anesth,1997,9:611-613.
  • 7Alcaraz AS,Quintana MB,Laguarda M.Placental transfer and neonatal effects of propofol in caesarean section.J Clin Phar Therapeuti,1998,3:19-23.
  • 8Jirasiritham S,Gantivitayatan K,Sirivararom P.Over half MAC sevoflurane in Caesarean section.J Med Assoc Thai,2005,88:914-920.
  • 9Cheng YJ,Wang YP,Fan SZ,et al.Intravenous infusion of low dose propofol for conscious sedation in Caesarean setion before spinal anesthesia.Acta Anaesthesiol Sin,1997,35,79-84.
  • 10夏云.目前产科麻醉中的热点讨论[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2007,28(4):380-384. 被引量:45

共引文献114

同被引文献102

引证文献12

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部