伪证罪的疑难问题研究——从128份刑事判决书说起

Research on Complex Perjury——Based on 128 Criminal Judgments

伪证行为严重干扰刑事诉讼活动的正常运行,正确认定伪证罪能够维护刑事诉讼追求的公平正义价值。此文对近二年的伪证罪案例进行了实证分析,之后分别讨论了伪证罪的主观目的问题,伪证罪主体之"证人"的范围问题,以及伪证罪的既遂状态问题,并分别得出了以下结论,即伪证罪的主观目的应限定在"陷害他人或者隐匿罪证",主体之"证人"的范围不应包含被害人和被告人,伪证罪的既遂状态应排除在侦查机关做假证后又翻供做真实证明的行为。

Perjury behavior seriously interferes with the normal operation of criminal proceedings, and a correct recognition of perjury can help guarantee the equity and justice of criminal litigation. This article analyzed the cases of perjury crimes in the past two years, and focused on the subjective intention of perjury, the scope of ＂witnesses＂ of the perjury and the status of the accomplishment of perjury. To conclude, the subjective intention should be limited to ＂framing others or concealing evidence＂, the scope of ＂witnesses＂ should not include the victim and the defendant, and the status of the accomplishment of perjury should exclude the retract behavior of false evidence of the investigation organ.