期刊文献+

美国高校如何培养院校研究专业人员——基于课程视角的调查分析 被引量:3

On the Training of Institutional Research Professionals in American Colleges and Universities
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于美国院校研究会官网的17所高校院校研究证书项目课程信息的研究结果显示,美国高校院校研究专业人员培养,在证书授予上,给学习合格者颁发培训证书或学位证书;在教育目标上,强调对程序性知识的运用与分析;在课程设置上,大多采用"必修+选修"套餐式结构;在课程内容上,重视方法、技术、政策与评估等实务;在教学方式上,广泛运用在线教学平台。这些对我国高校培养院校研究专业人员具有参考价值,对院校研究专业课程建设有启发意义。 This paper analyzes the ever-growing trend of professional training in this field in accordance with the curricular data collected from 17 graduate certificate programs in institutional researches.With a focus on the program structure and curriculum design,this paper offers an analysis of institutional research training programs provided by American colleges and universities from the following five perspectives:degrees granted,educational objectives,curriculum designs,course contents,and instructional methods.Despite the differences among those programs,we discovered that there are certain commonalities shared by those programs:1)non-degree or degree certificates are offered as qualifications;2)institutional research training often emphasizes the use and analysis of procedural knowledge;3)curriculum is comprised of compulsory and optional courses;4)courses focus on analytical methods(both quantitative and qualitative),educational policy evaluations,and program assessment;5)online instruction platforms are widely used;It is believed that this analysis can provide valuable implications for Chinese colleges and universities to train institutional research professionals,and especially for developing our professional courses in institutional researches.
作者 雷洪德 黄敏 Lei Hongde;Huang Min
出处 《高等工程教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期92-98,共7页 Research in Higher Education of Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金"十三五"规划2017年度教育学一般课题(BIA170190)
关键词 美国高校 院校研究 专业人员培养 课程研究 American colleges and universities institutional research professional training curriculum design
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘献君.大力加强院校研究 推进现代大学管理[J].高等教育研究,2005,26(1):35-39. 被引量:26
  • 2PetersoA M. Institutional Research and Management in the U.S. andEurope: Some EAIR - AIR Comparisons[G]// Roddy Begg (ed.). TheDialogue between Higher Education Research and Practice. NewYork: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003: 31-44.
  • 3常桐善.构建院校智能体系:院校研究发展的新趋势[J].髙等教育研究,2009(10): 49-54.
  • 4FrancisE Rourke,Glenn E Brooks. The Managerial Revolution inHigher Education[M].Baltimore: John Hopkins Press,1966: 44.
  • 5JoeL Saupe, James R Montgomery. The Nature and Role ofInstitutional Research; Memo to a College or University [M].Association for Institutional Research, 1970.
  • 6DresseIP L. The Shaping of Institutional Research and Planning[J].Research in Higher Education, 1981(14): 229-258.
  • 7Associationfor Institutional Research. About AIR[EB/OL].[2012-08-09].https://www.airweb.org/AboutUs/Pages/default.aspx.
  • 8VolkweinJ F. The Foundations and Evolution of InstitutionalResearch[J].New Directions for Institutional Research, 2008,141.
  • 9VolkweinJ F. The Four Faces of Institutional Research [J].NewDirections for Institutional Research, 1999,104.
  • 10季飞.解读大学内部资源分配的“首长化”倾向[J].现代教育管理,2010(12):8-12. 被引量:2

共引文献56

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部