摘要
关于教育是否属于社会上层建筑问题,长期争议不休,本文对杨贤江、刘佛年、于光远的相关见解,以及关于所谓"教育本质"问题争议中的是是非非加以分辨,着重指出其中问题的症结,在于对教育的一般性质与社会性质的区别以及教育与教-学活动之间的区分若明若暗所致,并尝试解答马克思在列举上层建筑诸现象时为何未提及教育问题。
The issue about education is included into social superstructure had been discussed for a long time. This paper distinguishes the related ideas from Yang Xianjiang, Liu Fonian and Yu Guangyuan, and rights and wrongs of discussion on education is included into social superstructure. At the same time, this paper pays much attention to point out the related issues, lying in the difference between the general nature and social nature of education, and the difference between education and teaching-learning activities, and tries to answer why Marx didn't mention education when listing social superstructure phenomenon.
作者
陈桂生
Chen Guisheng(Department of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 20006)
出处
《教育发展研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第8期1-5,共5页
Research in Educational Development
关键词
教育
社会上层建筑
教育的相对独立性
education
social superstructure
relative independence of education