人物关系和情节形式的双重性对《洛丽塔》中叙述距离的控制

The Control of Narrative Distances Through the Duality Feature in the Identity of the Narrator and The Plot Form in Lolita

关于《洛丽塔》的不可靠性一直存在争议。不可靠叙述概念的提出者布思认为,由于《洛丽塔》作者赋予不可靠叙述者充分而不受限制的叙述手段,导致作者的道德判断被遮掩。费伦根据不可靠叙述对作者的读者造成的影响提出了联结型不可靠性,认为由于作者巧妙地混合使用了疏远型和联结型不可靠性策略导致了《洛丽塔》的伦理之争。事实上,小说中人物关系和情节形式具有明显的双重性,使《洛丽塔》的不可靠叙述者和读者之间的情感和道德距离产生了出乎意料的变化。

The unreliability of Lolita has long been under dispute. According to Booth, who proposed the concept of the unreliable narrator, the authorial judgment was obscured due to the endowment of full and unlimited narrative strategies to the unreliable narrator by the author. Phelan, based on the effects of the unreliable narration on the authorial reader, coined the new concept of bonding unreliability, and concluded that the dispute over the ethics of Lolita was the result of the subtle and blended use of estranging unreliability and bonding unreliability by the author. There is, in effect, a distinctive feature of duality in both the identity of the narrator and the plot form of the novel that dramatically adjusts the moral and emotional distances between the unreliable narrator and the reader.