期刊文献+

A fine-grained perspective on the robustness of global cargo ship transportation networks 被引量:11

全球海洋运输网络健壮性评估(英文)
原文传递
导出
摘要 The robustness of cargo ship transportation networks is essential to the stability of the world trade system. The current research mainly focuses on the coarse-grained, holistic cargo ship transportation network while ignoring the structural diversity of different sub-networks. In this paper, we evaluate the robustness of the global cargo ship transportation network based on the most recent Automatic Identification System(AIS) data available. First, we subdivide three typical cargo ship transportation networks(i.e., oil tanker, container ship and bulk carrier) from the original cargo ship transportation network. Then, we design statistical indices based on complex network theory and employ four attack strategies, including random attack and three intentional attacks(i.e., degree-based attack, betweenness-based attack and flux-based attack) to evaluate the robustness of the three typical cargo ship transportation networks. Finally, we compare the integrity of the remaining ports of the network when a small proportion of ports lose their function. The results show that 1) compared with the holistic cargo ship transportation network, the fine-grain-based cargo ship transportation networks can fully reflect the pattern and process of global cargo transportation; 2) different cargo ship networks behave heterogeneously in terms of their robustness, with the container network being the weakest and the bulk carrier network being the strongest; and 3) small-scale intentional attacks may have significant influence on the integrity of the container network but a minor impact on the bulk carrier and oil tanker transportation networks. These conclusions can help improve the decision support capabilities in maritime transportation planning and emergency response and facilitate the establishment of a more reliable maritime transportation system.Abstract: The robustness of cargo ship transportation networks is essential to the stability of the world trade system. The current research mainly focuses on the coarse-grained, holistic cargo ship transportation network while ignoring the structural diversity of different sub-networks. In this paper, we evaluate the robustness of the global cargo ship transporta- tion network based on the most recent Automatic Identification System (AIS) data available. First, we subdivide three typical cargo ship transportation networks (i.e., oil tanker, container ship and bulk carrier) from the original cargo ship transportation network. Then, we design statistical indices based on complex network theory and employ four attack strategies, in- cluding random attack and three intentional attacks (i.e., degree-based attack, between- ness-based attack and flux-based attack) to evaluate the robustness of the three typical cargo ship transportation networks. Finally, we compare the integrity of the remaining ports of the network when a small proportion of ports lose their function. The results show that 1) com- pared with the holistic cargo ship transportation network, the fine-grain-based cargo ship transportation networks can fully reflect the pattern and process of global cargo transportation 2) different cargo ship networks behave heterogeneously in terms of their robustness, with the container network being the weakest and the bulk carrier network being the strongest; and 3) small-scale intentional attacks may have significant influence on the integrity of the con- tainer network but a minor impact on the bulk carrier and oil tanker transportation networks.These conclusions can help improve the decision support capabilities in maritime transportation planning and emergency response and facilitate the establishment of a more reliable maritime transportation system. The robustness of cargo ship transportation networks is essential to the stability of the world trade system. The current research mainly focuses on the coarse-grained, holistic cargo ship transportation network while ignoring the structural diversity of different sub-networks. In this paper, we evaluate the robustness of the global cargo ship transportation network based on the most recent Automatic Identification System(AIS) data available. First, we subdivide three typical cargo ship transportation networks(i.e., oil tanker, container ship and bulk carrier) from the original cargo ship transportation network. Then, we design statistical indices based on complex network theory and employ four attack strategies, including random attack and three intentional attacks(i.e., degree-based attack, betweenness-based attack and flux-based attack) to evaluate the robustness of the three typical cargo ship transportation networks. Finally, we compare the integrity of the remaining ports of the network when a small proportion of ports lose their function. The results show that 1) compared with the holistic cargo ship transportation network, the fine-grain-based cargo ship transportation networks can fully reflect the pattern and process of global cargo transportation; 2) different cargo ship networks behave heterogeneously in terms of their robustness, with the container network being the weakest and the bulk carrier network being the strongest; and 3) small-scale intentional attacks may have significant influence on the integrity of the container network but a minor impact on the bulk carrier and oil tanker transportation networks. These conclusions can help improve the decision support capabilities in maritime transportation planning and emergency response and facilitate the establishment of a more reliable maritime transportation system.
出处 《Journal of Geographical Sciences》 SCIE CSCD 2018年第7期881-899,共19页 地理学报(英文版)
基金 Key Project of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,No.ZDRW-ZS-2016-6-3 National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.41501490
关键词 complex network FINE-GRAINED cargo ship transportation network ROBUSTNESS automatic identification system 交通网络 坚韧性 货物 轮船 纹理 自动鉴定系统 攻击策略 网络评估
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献50

  • 1王成金,于良.世界集装箱港的形成演化及与国际贸易的耦合机制[J].地理研究,2007,26(3):557-568. 被引量:24
  • 2田炜,邓贵仕,武佩剑,车文娇.世界航运网络复杂性分析[J].大连理工大学学报,2007,47(4):605-609. 被引量:42
  • 3ALBERT R,JEONG H, BARABASI A L. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J]. Nature, 2000, 406:378-382.
  • 4CRUCITTI P, LATORA V, MARCIORI M, et al. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks [J]. Physlca A, 2004, 340:388-394.
  • 5NOTTEBOOM T E. Container shipping and ports: an overview [J]. Review of Network Economics, 2004, 3(2): 86-106.
  • 6WATTS D J, STROGATZ S H. Collective dynamics of small world networks [J]. Nature, 1998, 393: 440-442.
  • 7NEWMAN M E J. Assortative mixing in networks [J]. Physical Review Letters, 2002, 89(20) : 208701.
  • 8BOCCALETTI S, LATORA V, MORENO Y, et al. Complex networks: Structure and dynamics [J]. Physics Reports, 2006, 424.. 175-308.
  • 9ALBERT R, BARABA, SI A L. Statistical mechanics of complex network [J]. Review of Modern Physics, 2002, 74(1): 47-97.
  • 10STROGATZ S H. Exploring complex networks [J]. Nature, 2001, 410:268-276.

共引文献66

同被引文献134

引证文献11

二级引证文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部