试论《文心雕龙注订》对“范注”的订补与因袭——以范文澜、张立斋《文心雕龙·原道》注为例

Revisal and Borrowing from “Fan's Annotations” in The Annotations of the Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons——Fan Wenlan and Zhang Lizhai's Origin of Tao

张立斋先生的《文心雕龙注订》是中国台湾地区"龙学"界最早的一部专著,其自谓"注订之作,一以正诸本之讹失,与补其所未备"。实际上,其书主要是对范文澜《文心雕龙注》的订补,张氏欲订补"范注",以成新书,嘉惠士林,心志所冀,诚可钦也。然而,将"范注"与张氏之订补两相对照、细加比勘,则不难发现,张氏对"范注"之订补,除偶有进益之解、稍补"范注"未备之外,多为讹失之评,或仅一家之言。《文心雕龙注订》一书过于倚重"范注",其出典与校勘,或直接迻录"范注",或部分酌取"范注",或间接化用"范注",留下了明显的因袭痕迹。

Zhang Lizhai＇s Annotations of the Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons（Annotations）is the earliest publication in the field of the Literary Mind and the Carving of Dragons researches in the region of Taiwan.Although he stated that＂the purpose of the Annotations is to supplement what is lacked of in the other annotations＂,he paid more attention to Fan Wenlan＇s annotations.However,when comparing the annotations of Zhang and Fan,it is easy to find that Zhang＇s revisal only played a complementary role in supplementing Fan＇s annotations.Meanwhile,the Annotations is highly dependent on Fan＇s annotations,as its texts,editing,collation and references come from Fan＇s annotations directly or indirectly.