仲裁裁决撤销制度应被废除吗?

Should the Setting Aside of the Arbitral Award be Abolished?

本文作者Albert Jan van den Berg受邀于2013年9月13日在德国发表第2届“Karl-Heinz B（o｜¨）ckstiegel讲座”。本文基于该讲座内容整理而成。通过析出撤销之诉所衍生的各种问题,文章对裁决撤销制度是否应被废除作了深入探讨。这些问题包括：双重监督与判决冲突的可能性;裁决来源地国撤销决定的（普遍）效力;对国际仲裁裁决效力拥有最终裁断权的法院归属;裁决撤销之诉的起源及其当前在国际仲裁领域的法律地位;降低或消除国际仲裁领域裁决撤销制度的意义的各种尝试;投资仲裁中的相关情况;裁决撤销制度是否应被废除,若答案为肯定,则有何替代方案。

The text of the 2nd Karl-Heina Brckstiegel Lecture of 13 September 2013 as adapted for publication examines the question on whether the setting aside of the arbitral award should be abolished. It does so by identifying the various issues that arise out of an action for setting aside, such as the decisions, the （ universal ） possibility of double control and conflicting effect of a setting aside in the country of origin and the court with the last say on the validity of an international arbitral award. The origin of the action for setting aside and its current legal status in international arbitration. The various attempts to reduce or eliminate the role of setting aside in international arbitration. The situation in investment arbitration. Whether the setting aside action should be abolished and if so, what may be the alternatives.