期刊文献+

后人类叙事与文明的未来——对C.S.路易斯科幻小说《黑暗之劫》的一种阐述 被引量:1

Post-human Narrative and the Future of Civilization:An Interpretation of That Hideous Strength by C.S. Lewis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英国著名作家C.S.路易斯发表于1945年的科幻小说《黑暗之劫》对"后人类"问题有一种极富前瞻性的预测和探讨。他利用科幻小说的虚构特征,推测和阐释"后人类社会"可能发生的"人性"被黑暗势力洗劫,即人类的身体、意识和情感会逐渐被智能机器发明和科技思维崇拜所弃用或消解。他的这部科幻小说巧妙地在一种后人类语境中"探究生命意蕴",其独到之处在于运用双线叙事将科技的未来与欧洲古典时期、高科技成果与历史传说人物进行多维对照和奇幻穿越。在一场无法避免的未来正邪力量的决战之中,C.S.路易斯神奇地指引读者利用古典的"他者"立场,超越浅近的"过去"和短期的"未来"的束缚,去认同身心一体之人性和大于地球之宇宙规律存在的永恒性。 The science fiction That Hideous Strength published by the well-known English writer C.S.Lewis in 1945, has visionary prediction and discussion on the problem of Post-human. The imaginative characteristics of the science fiction is adopted by C.S. Lewis to speculate and explain that the nature of human being might be ruined by the dark side in the post-human society, namely the physical body, mind and emotion would be abolished or eliminated by the artificial intelligence and the scientism. This fiction explores the meaning of life in a post-human context in a smart and neat way. The uniqueness of the fiction lays on the utilization of two-line narrative to realize the multi-dimensional comparison between the future of science and technology and the classical time of Europe, and the achievements of high-tech and the legendary icons in history, and the fascinating reviving of the latter. In an inevitable final campaign between the good and evil, the readers are guided cleverly by the writer using the Other perspective of the classic to surpass the limit of the superficial "Past"and the short-sighted "Future", and to identify human essence with the mind and body harmonious and to recognize the eternity exists beyond the universe law of Earth.
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期141-148,共8页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词 C.S.路易斯 《黑暗之劫》 后人类主义 科幻小说 C.S.Lewis That Hideous Strength post-humanism science fiction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献42

  • 1Time, Jan 3, 1983, p. 3.
  • 2Kaja Silverman, The Subject of Semiotics, New York: Oxford UP, 1983, p. vii.
  • 3William Brown, "Man without a Movie Camera-Movies without Men", in Warren Buckland (ed),Film Theory and Contemporary Hollywood Movies, London & New York: ILoutledge, 2009, p. 67, pp. 66-85, p. 68, p. 69, p. 73, p. 74.
  • 4Neil Badmington, Posthumanism, New York: Palgrave, 2000, p. 3, p. 6, p. 7, p. 7.
  • 5Ihab Hassan,"Prometheus as Performer: Toward a Posthumanist Culture? A University Masque in Five Scenes", Georgia Review 31(1977): 843.
  • 6Katherine Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics, Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press, 1999, p. 7, p. xii, pp. 2-3.
  • 7Donna Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, London & New York: R.outledge, 1991, p. 163.
  • 8《类人猿、赛博格和女性:自然的再创造》第8章,第149页至182页.
  • 9Cary Wolfe, What is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010, pp. xxv-xxvi, p. xii.
  • 10Leon Gurevitch, "The Cinemas of Interactions: Cinematics and the'Game Effect' in the Age of Digital Attractions", Senses of Cinema 57 (2010).

共引文献84

同被引文献8

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部