论作为民族地区纠纷解决方式的“北川模式”

Second Discussion on“Beichuan Mode”as the Way of Dispute Resolution in Ethnic Areas

"北川模式"作为对北川羌族自治县纠纷解决经验的抽象,如果要将其扩展到其他地区,应做到如下两点:其一,"北川模式"在本质上是中国改革开放以来(甚至可以说1840年以来)如何处置法律资源的中国因素和西方因素的问题。通过对梳理改革开放以来的中国法学者对中国经验的研究,找到了其所处的位置,即"北川模式"与"大调解制度"并立、与苏力、左卫民对基层司法经验实践经验一脉相承;但其与"大调解制度"、与"北川模式"类似的"枫桥经验"等也有很多不同。其二,在此基础之上,我们离析出作为纠纷解决方式的"北川模式"可以扩展的向度与限度。

The mode of beichuan is an abstraction of the dispute resolution experience in Beichuan Qiang Autonomous County. If we want to extend to other regions, the following two points should be done： First, the mode of beichuan essentially solves such an issue that how to handle legal resources between traditional china and the western since the reform and opening up. Through seeking the Chinese experience of grassroots justice in the angle of jurists（ie Su Li, Zuo Weimin and the ＂grand mediation system＂, and etc.）, we could find the location, in other words, they have the same strain; and on the other hand, they have some difference. Second, on the difference of them, we can find the direction of development and its limits.