期刊文献+

货币与总体:关于价值形成和转形的又一轮争论 被引量:3

Money and Totality: Another Round of Debate on Value Formation and Transformation
原文传递
导出
摘要 弗雷德·莫斯利(Fred Moseley)的《货币与总体》一书介绍了作者关于马克思价值理论的"宏观货币解释",特别涉及《资本论》第三卷中价值到生产价格的转形。这个理论虽然试图忠实于马克思的文本,但却通过一个逻辑上站不住脚的主张来实现这一点。如果它被认为是代表了马克思的工作,那么这将会导致剔除和否定马克思主义的传统。比照莫斯利的贡献,用非技术的术语,回顾长期存在的"转形问题"争论,表明前进的道路是要避开那些对马克思所进行的基于文本的正统辩护,在20世纪马克思主义理论研究成果的基础上,尽可能利用现代经济理论和社会科学的工具与方法,重新展开马克思的核心见解。 Fred Moseley's Money and Totality (2016) presents the author's "macro- monetary interpreta- tion" of Marx's value theory, with particular reference to the transformation of value into price of production in Capital, volume III. This theory, while trying to be faithful to Marx's texts, accomplishes this by means of a logically indefensible claim, which, if it came to be seen as representing Marx's work as such, would contrib- ute to sidelining and disconfirming the Marxist tradition. Review of the long - standing "transformation prob- lem" debate, in the light of Moseley's contribution, in non - technical terms, suggests that the way forward is to avoid text - based orthodox defenses of Marx in favor of re - working his core insights, building on the ac- complishments of Marxist theory in the 20th century and using the tools and methods of modern economic theo- ry and social science wherever possible.
作者 大卫.莱伯曼 张忠胜 David Laibman;Zhang Zhong- sheng(Department of Economics (Emeritus), Brooklyn College and Graduate School, City University of New York, New York USA 11238;School of Maxism, Central Universityof Finance and Economics ,Beijing China 10008)
出处 《经济纵横》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期18-28,共11页 Economic Review Journal
关键词 马克思主义价值理论 转形问题 劳动价值 Marxist Value Theory Transformation Problem Labor Value
  • 相关文献

同被引文献71

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部