摘要
统一政权的长期统治在其版图上会形成观念上的地域结构,这对于继承其国号的政权而言无疑形成了规范作用。而寄寓型政权播越的特点,决定了其与普通的割据政权完全不同的取向。蜀汉与东晋虽然在立国过程中有诸多不同,但在发展的轨迹上却有诸多相似之处,即对本土民的态度上都保持了不应有的距离,而对外则表现出与其自身实力不相符的攻击性。这两个取向前者决定了政权基础的单一,而后者造就了政权内部无法摆脱的权力之争。北伐即代表了复仇也代表了光复旧壤,在特殊的政治形式中这不仅仅体现为军事活动,更体现为权力争夺乃至鞭策皇权的工具。
Long-term reunification of the unified regime could form a conceptual regional structure on its territory,which would undoubtedly become a standard for the next regime that inherits its national identity.This feature undoubtedly had a great effect on Sui,Han and Eastern Jin Dynasties.Away from its native land,the"lodge government"had a totally different orientation from its separate regime.Though Shu,Han and Eastern Jin had much difference in founding of the nation,still they had much similarity in that they kept an undue distance from the aboriginal people,and showed strong aggressiveness unconformable to their own strength.Of the two orientations the former ordained a single political foundation,while the latter was doomed to have inner inextricab power struggles.The Northern Expedition in China was meant to restore the native land,which,in particular political situations,not only demonstrated as a military activity,but also as a tool to curb the imperial power.
出处
《社会科学战线》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期126-139,共14页
Social Science Front
