期刊文献+

全球贫困问题的解决:论托马斯·博格的消极义务及制度性人权

Resolving Global Poverty——Discuss Thomas Pogge's Negative Duty and Institutional Human Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 托马斯·博格关于全球贫困问题的观点,主要体现在不伤害的消极义务和制度性人权这两个重要的概念上。两者也面临一些重要质疑,如,只关注消极义务而不关注积极义务对于贫困人口的人权实现是远远不够的,以及制度性人权限制了人权的普遍性问题。基于消极义务对于贫困人口人权的实现更具紧迫性和制度性人权是在承认人权普遍性的基础上从全球经济制度层面上保证全球穷人的人权的实现问题,这些批评都不成立。对于"博格的不伤害的消极义务不能充分保障全球穷人的人权"的质疑,也让我们重新反思全球正义的核心问题。
作者 苏静
出处 《理论月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期130-135,共6页 Theory Monthly
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献24

  • 1Thomas Pogge, World Poverty and Human Rights : Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, Polity Press, 2002.
  • 2Alison M. Jaggar, "Introduction", in Alison M. Jaggar, ed. , Thomas Pogge and His Critics, Polity Press, 2010, p. 1, p. 12.
  • 3Shmuel Nili, "Our Problem of Global Justice", Social Theory and Practice, Vol. 37, No. 4, 2011 , pp. 629 -630.
  • 4Thomas Pogge, "Responses to the Critics", in Alison M. Jaggar, ed. , Thomas Pogge and His Critics, Polity Press, 2010, p. 232, p. 199, pp. 194-195.
  • 5Kok-Chor Tan, "Rights, Harm, and Institutions', in Alison M. Jaggar, ed. , Thomas Pogge and His Critics, Polity Press, 2010, pp. 51-52, p. 58, pp. 55-56, 58-59, 61, 63, pp. 57-58, p. 59, 60- 61, pp. 48 -49, 52 -53, 63 -64, p. 64.
  • 6Jiwei Ci, "What Negative Duties? Which Moral umversmlsm , in Alison M. Jaggar, ed. Thomas Pogge and His Critics, Polity Press, 2010, pp. 94-95, p. 86, pp. 84-86, 90-91, pp. 86-87, p. 84, p. 87.
  • 7Thomas Pogge, " Severe Poverty as a Violation of NegativeDuteis", Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 19, Issue 1, 2005, pp. 68 -69.
  • 8"ConfiningPogge's Analysis of Global Poverty to Genuinely Negative Duties", Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 16, Issue 2, 2013, pp. 371 -372.
  • 9Tan, " Rights, Harm, and Institutions", pp. 56 -58.
  • 10Pogge,"Responses to the Critics", pp. 194- 195.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部