期刊文献+

以知识产权管理体系保护企业商业秘密——兼论新《反不正当竞争法》相关要件修改 被引量:2

Protecting Commercial Secrets of Enterprises through Intellectual Property Management System——Concurrently Analyzing Amendment in the New Anti-Unfair Competition Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 商业秘密是企业在市场竞争中保持优势的重要因素,国际条约、双边协定以及美、英、德、日等国的法律法规,均强调对商业秘密的合理保护。我国判定商业秘密多依据《反不正当竞争法》,2018年生效的新《反不正当竞争法》对商业秘密的要件作出了一定修改,将"经济实用性"变更为"商业价值性",这种改变拓宽了商业秘密保护的范围。在此良好的立法趋势下,企业应紧跟法律潮流,主动根据法律规定界定商业秘密,并通过知识产权管理体系以及内联网、时间戳等先进技术维护自身合法权益。 Commercial secret is a vital factor for enterprises to hold on to their favourable positions.International treaties,bilateral agreements and national laws in America,England,Germany and Japan all emphasize the importance of protection on them.The new Anti-Unfair Competition Law,which came into effect in 2018,has made some changes in the elements of commercial secret,changing economic practicality into commercial value.Thus it actually broadens the protection scope of commercial secrets.In such a promising legislative trend,it is high time that enterprises redefine commercial secret according to the new laws and protect themselves by adopting intellectual property management system and enhance high technologies like intranet and timestamp.
作者 张鸽 黄琳琳 ZHANG Ge;HUANG Linlin(School of Transnational Law East China University of Political Science and Law. , Shanghai 20004)
出处 《上海商学院学报》 2018年第2期49-59,共11页 Business Economic Review
关键词 商业秘密 企业 侵权行为 保护措施 知识产权管理体系 commercial secret enterprise tort protection measures intellectual property managementsystem
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献30

  • 1唐海滨,孙才森,梁彦,王莉萍.有关商业秘密立法的重点难点问题[J].中国法学,1999(4):20-32. 被引量:38
  • 2刘金波,朴勇植.日、美商业秘密保护法律制度比较研究[J].中国法学,1994(3):109-116. 被引量:30
  • 3W R Cornish. Intellectual Property : Patents, Copy right Trade Marks and Allied Rights [M]. London: Sweet'Maxwell, 1999.
  • 4商业秘密法制从书编辑委员会.商业秘密法制现状分析及案例[M].北京:中国法制出版社,1995:50.
  • 5Paul Goldstein, Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines, 2008, pp 117-118.
  • 6Wexler v. Greenburg, 399 Pa. 569, 125 USPQ 471 (1960).
  • 7Reed, Robert Association, Inc. v. Strauman, 40 N. Y. 2d, 386 N.Y.S. 2d 677 (Court of Appeals of New York, 1976).
  • 8Business and Professions Code of California, sections 16600.
  • 9Ronald Gilson, "The Legal Infrastructure of High Technology Industrial District: Silicon Valley, Route 128, and Covenants Not to Compete" , 74 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 575, 578 (1999).
  • 10Whyte v. Schlage Lock Co., 125 Cal. Rptr.2d 277(Court of Appeal of Cal., 2002).

共引文献157

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部