期刊文献+

关于多中心临床试验伦理协作审查的思考 被引量:7

Consideration of ethical collaborative review of multi-center clinical trials
原文传递
导出
摘要 多中心合作开展药物临床试验已成为常态,多中心研究机构伦理委员会各自审查给研究的实施造成了负担,可能导致项目启动延迟。中共中央办公厅和国务院办公厅印发的《关于深化审评审批制度改革鼓励药品医疗器械创新的意见》明确指出要完善伦理委员会机制、提高伦理审查效率。针对如何提高多中心伦理审查效率避免重复审查,本文结合中国临床研究能力提升与受试者保护高峰论坛(CCHRPP)的《临床研究伦理协作审查共识(试行版)》,梳理了我国多中心研究伦理协作审查落地需要解决的几个问题。 Multi-center cooperation in drug clinical trials has become the normal,and the multi-center research institution ethics committees review respectively has caused a burden on the implementation of the study and delayed project initiation. Opinions on Deepening the Reform of Review,Examination and Approval System,and Encouraging the Innovation of Drugs and Medical Devices of the General Office of the CPC Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council clearly points out that it is necessary to improve the ethics committee mechanism and improve the efficiency of ethical review. How to improve the efficiency of multi-centered ethics review to avoid double reviews? This article sorts out several issues that need to be addressed in the multi-center research ethics collaborative review in China combined with CCHRPP 's Clinical Research Ethical Collaborative Review Consensus( Trial version).
作者 黄旭 汪秀琴 HUANG Xu;WANG Xiu-qin(The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China)
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第11期1290-1293,共4页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
关键词 多中心临床试验 伦理协作审查 伦理审查模式 muhi-center clinical trials ethical collaborative review ethical review mode
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献15

  • 1赵帼英,江滨,史录文.我国药物临床试验伦理委员会运作模式及监管机制探讨[J].中国药事,2007,21(1):25-28. 被引量:25
  • 2Directive 2001/20/EC of the European parliament and the council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use [EB/OL]. (2001 - 05 - 01 ). http://europa. eu/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2001/1 121/1_ 12120010501 en00340044. pdf.
  • 3Central Office for Research Ethics Committees, Governance atrangements for NHS Research Ethics Committees E EB/OL]. (2001 - 07 -05 ). http ://www. dh. gov. uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_ digitalassets/.
  • 4National Research Ethics Services. Standing Operating Procedures for Research Ethics Committees, Version3.4 [ EB/OL ]. (2007 - 09- 02). http://www, nres. npsa. nhs. uk/news-and-publications/publications/standard-operating-procedures/.
  • 5US DHHS & FDA. Using a centralized IRB review process inmulticenter clinical trial [ EB/OL] . ( 2006 -03). http ://www.fda. gov/Regulatory Information/Guidances/ucml 27004. html.
  • 6国家食品药品监督管理局.关于印发“药物临床试验伦理审査工作指导原则”的通知[EB/OL]. (2010 - 11 -02). ht-tp://www. sda. gov. cn/WS01/CL0055/55613. html.
  • 7熊宁宁,李煜,汪秀琴,等.临床试验机构伦理委员会操作规程[M].科学出版社,2012:37 -42.
  • 8SILBERMAN G, KAHN KL. Burdens on research imposed byinstitutional review boards : the state of the evidence and its im-plications for regulatory reform [ J ]. Milbank Q, 2011,89 (4):599 -627.
  • 9ADA. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking ( ANPRM). [ EB/OL] . ( 2011 - 06 - 26 ). www. ada. gov/anprm2010/an-prm2010. htm.
  • 10PUTNEY SB. Central IRB review[R],南京:赛诺菲中国研发中心与江苏省人民医院临床研究及伦理高级培训班.2013.

共引文献33

同被引文献73

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部