期刊文献+

刑事调解:让被害人可见的工具,刑事司法公正的有机组成 被引量:3

Mediation: An Instrument Which Can Be Seen by the Victim and an Organic Part of Judicial Justice
下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑事调解是刑事司法体系整体性的进步要素,也是保护公众利益的利器。对于被害人而言,刑事调解的意义尤为重大。之前被害人几乎生活在法律真空中,在关乎诉讼主体的程序设置框架中处于劣势地位。尽管重新发现和恢复被害人身份的运动更多地在盎格鲁-撒克逊国家发生,但它之后逐渐向大多数欧洲国家扩展。被害人通过刑事调解制度变得"可见"起来。应该最大限度扩展刑事调解制度的适用范围,这应该以限制国家公权力,扩展个人意思自由理念为支撑。 Mediation is a further element of what the criminal justice system should mean. An affirmation that will not lead us back to our national model exclusively, but quite the opposite, may refer to any criminal juridical procedural system, even those in which, as a legal instrument for the protection of the public, it now consolidates. It is in the 1970 s when, in some countries with more impetus than in others, that movement to"rediscover"the victim begins, given the state in which criminal prosecution leaves the latter. In brief, the victim lives in a legal vacuum which implies, at least, in the framework of their consideration as a person with rights,a situation of inferiority in the procedural setting with regard to the subjects intervening in the proceedings.With regard to mediation, it should not be limited in legal terms, but instead let those that live the experience of"criminal prosecution"in the social and democratic state be the ones that recommend or otherwise the possible referral of"those"victims to mediation. On the basis of that referral, the essential work will be in the hands of the criminal mediator who should demonstrate capability and skill not only to be a"mediator"but to be a"good mediator", knowledgeable of the law that underpins the task.
作者 S.维拉尔 郭烁 Silvia Barona Vilar ;Translated by GUO Shuo
出处 《求是学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期10-19,共10页 Seeking Truth
基金 北京交通大学基本科研业务费人文社会科学专项基金资助项目“认罪认罚从宽背景下酌定不起诉制度再审视”(2018JBW002)
关键词 刑事调解 恢复性司法 被害人 刑事司法 mediation recovering jurisdiction victim criminal jurisdiction
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献66

  • 1冯象.案子为什么难办——政法笔记[J].读书,2000(11):68-75. 被引量:10
  • 2张 骐.论法的价值共识——对当代中国法治进程中一个悖论的解决尝试[J].法制与社会发展,2001,7(5):7-23. 被引量:35
  • 3[德]阿图尔·考夫曼 温弗里德·哈斯默尔.《当代法哲学和法律理论导论》[M].[北京]法律出版社,2002年版.第105页.
  • 4[美]艾伦·沃森著.《民法法系的演变及形成》[M].中国政法大学,1992年版.第51页.
  • 5[英]约翰·巴罗著,李新洲,等译.《不论-科学的极限与极限的科学》.上海科学技术出版社2000年版,第28页.
  • 6Gunther Teubner, Law as An Autopoietic System, Blackwell Publishers, 1993, p. 2.
  • 7Gunther Teubner, Law as An Autopoietic System, Blackwell Publishers, 1993, pp. 3-4.
  • 8Gunther Teubner, Law as An Autopoietic System, Blackwell Publishers, 1993, p. 2.
  • 9Gunther Teubner, Law as An Autopoietic System, Blaekwell Publishers, 1993, p. 8.
  • 10Gunther Teubner, Law as An Autopoietic System, Blaekwell Publishers, 1993, P. 9.

同被引文献43

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部