两岸四地间相互执行仲裁裁决:过去、现在及将来(上)

Approaches of Mutual Enforcement of China's Mainland and Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan Arbitral Awards

比较我国内地与香港、澳门、台湾地区承认及执行外国仲裁裁决的制度，并研究了内地与港澳地区在“一国两制”实现前后相互执行仲裁裁决以及内地与台湾地区相互认可和执行仲裁裁决的法律规定及实践，1958年《纽约公约》可资借鉴以统一我国区际仲裁裁决的执行。内地与港澳地区之间实际上采纳了《纽约公约》的实质内容，但内地与台湾地区之间则彼此把对方的裁决视为既非外国裁决也非本地裁决的第三类裁决，显然不利于提高两岸之间的执行效率。两岸应正视这一问题，改变观念。在此基础上，统一我国的区际仲裁裁决执行制度，使仲裁更好地服务于四地间的商务交流。

Based on a comparative study of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in China's Mainland, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan, law and practice of mutual enforcement of China's Mainland, Hong Kong and Macao arbitration awards before and after ＂One Country, Two System＂ coming into force as well as that of acknowledgement and enforcement of China's Mainland and Taiwan arbitration awards, this paper opines that the 1958 New York Convention should be borrowed to unify enforcement of interregional arbitration awards in China. While the substance of New York Convention has been adopted for China's Mainland and Hong Kong, Macao arbitration awards, both sides across the Strait take the other＇ s arbitral awards as sui generis, neither foreign nor domestic, which obviously prejudice to the effectiveness ofcorss-straitenforcementof arbitration awards. The author raises that each side should reconsider its policy and keep pace with international general practice in order to unify enforcement of interregional arbitration awards in China and promotearbitration＇ sservice qualitytointerregional commercial transactions.