摘要
本文通过分析公司内部职务发明奖励和报酬规则是否有效的司法案例,归纳出司法的判断标准。建议将发明人职业"选择空间"的大小作为考量因素。
Through the recapitulation of a precedent judgement regarding the availability of reward and remuneration provision, which has been stipulated in the process of the service inventiveness in enterprises, this article summarizes benchmarks in reference on which the legal effects of the pre-invention assignment agreement could be tested, and suggests judges taking the leeway for employee inventors＇ free selection of jobs into account while making judicial decisions.
作者
顾昕
GU Xin(Intellectual Property Development ＆ Research Center, SIPO, Beijing 100088)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2018年第6期108-111,共4页
China Invention & Patent
基金
2017年国家知识产权局软科学研究项目<知识产权行政与司法协作机制研究--基于知识产权基础理论的考察>(项目编号:SS17-B-22)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
公司
职务发明
奖励和报酬规则
enterprises
service inventiveness
the reward and remuneration rules
