摘要
专利法上的"禁止反悔原则"体现了在平衡"保护范围明确化"与"权利保护周全化"两种利益上的独特作用。本文在此原理上提出在适用要件与效果上应采纳"可预见性"标准,从而恰当地排除专利权人在专利申请或专利文件修改时针对可以预见的技术方案请求等同侵权的主张。
The principle of "prosecution history estoppels" in patent law serves a unique function in balancing two different interests; on one side it fi xes the scope of right protection, and on the other side it provides adequate protection to the right. This article, based thereon, suggests that the "foreseeability" standard should be adopted both in the requirements and effects, thus properly preventing patentee from claiming for infringement under the "doctrine of equivalents" on the grounds that the technical solution in question is foreseeable when applying for the patent or modifying patent document.
作者
张鹏
ZHANG Peng(Institute of Law, CASS, Beijing 100720)
出处
《中国发明与专利》
2018年第6期112-114,共3页
China Invention & Patent
基金
2017年国家知识产权局软科学研究项目<知识产权行政与司法协作机制研究--基于知识产权基础理论的考察>(项目编号:SS17-B-22)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
禁止反悔原则
完全排除
弹性排除
可预见排除
prosecution history estoppels
complete bar approach
flexible bar approach
foreseeable bar approach