跨学科论文评价体系的模式案例研究——以公共卫生领域为例

Case study on interdisciplinary papers evaluation system：public health

目的聚焦公共卫生领域，以案例研究的形式验证本研究前期基于特征匹配法构建的跨学科论文评价模式的可行性，以期为跨学科的科研评价提供支撑与铺垫。方法运用特征匹配法、德尔菲专家函询法以及归一化评价等方法对公共卫生领域24个二级学科进行相关关键字以及期刊的检索分析；对公共卫生领域各二级学科进行关联性期刊分析，构建相应的评价模式，进而进行相关案例验证。结果本研究以案例的形式验证了跨学科论文评价模式是可行的。结论本研究有望为跨学科的科研评价提供切实可行的评价依据，从而使跨学科科研评价结果更加公正可靠。

Objective To verify the feasibility of interdisciplinary literature evaluation model based on feature matching method, and provide support for further interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation. Methods Feature matching method, Delphi expert enquiry, and normalization methods were used to analyze the keywords and journals of 24 secondary subjects in public health. Relevant journals analysis was conducted to establish a new evaluation model, which was also verified by case studies. Results The interdisciplinary literature evaluation model was feasible. Conclusions This study provided feasibility evidence for interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation to improve the jusice and reliability of interdisciplinary scientific research evaluation results.