期刊文献+

Joint TDOA, FDOA and differential Doppler rate estimation: Method and its performance analysis 被引量:16

Joint TDOA, FDOA and differential Doppler rate estimation: Method and its performance analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 Considering the estimation accuracy reduction of Frequency Difference of Arrival (FDOA) caused by relative Doppler companding, a joint Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA), FDOA and differential Doppler rate estimation method is proposed and its Cramer-Rao low bound is derived in this paper. Firstly, second-order ambiguity function is utilized to reduce the dimensionality and estimate initial TDOA and differential Doppler rate. Secondly, the TDOA estimation is updated and FDOA is obtained using cross ambiguity function, in which relative Doppler com- panding is compensated by the existing differential Doppler rate. Thirdly, differential Doppler rate estimation is updated using cross estimator. Theoretical analysis on estimation variance and Cramer-Rao low bound shows that the final estimation of TDOA, FDOA and differential Doppler rate performs well at both low and high signal-noise ratio, although the initial estimation accuracy of TDOA and differential Doppler rate is relatively poor under low signal-noise ratio conditions. Simulation results finally verify the theoretical analysis and show that the proposed method can overcome relative Doppler companding problem and performs well for all TDOA, FDOA and differential Doppler rate estimation. Considering the estimation accuracy reduction of Frequency Difference of Arrival (FDOA) caused by relative Doppler companding, a joint Time Difference of Arrival (TDOA), FDOA and differential Doppler rate estimation method is proposed and its Cramer-Rao low bound is derived in this paper. Firstly, second-order ambiguity function is utilized to reduce the dimensionality and estimate initial TDOA and differential Doppler rate. Secondly, the TDOA estimation is updated and FDOA is obtained using cross ambiguity function, in which relative Doppler com- panding is compensated by the existing differential Doppler rate. Thirdly, differential Doppler rate estimation is updated using cross estimator. Theoretical analysis on estimation variance and Cramer-Rao low bound shows that the final estimation of TDOA, FDOA and differential Doppler rate performs well at both low and high signal-noise ratio, although the initial estimation accuracy of TDOA and differential Doppler rate is relatively poor under low signal-noise ratio conditions. Simulation results finally verify the theoretical analysis and show that the proposed method can overcome relative Doppler companding problem and performs well for all TDOA, FDOA and differential Doppler rate estimation.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Aeronautics》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2018年第1期137-147,共11页 中国航空学报(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.61671273)
关键词 Differential Doppler rate Frequency difference of arrival Passive location Performance analysis Time difference of arrival Differential Doppler rate Frequency difference of arrival Passive location Performance analysis Time difference of arrival
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

共引文献49

同被引文献142

引证文献16

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部