城市低效工业用地研究进展——基于供给侧结构性改革的思考

Research progress on inefficient urban industrial land based on supply side structural reform

在供给侧结构性改革的背景下,城市低效工业用地研究日趋受到学者们的关注。本文基于"内涵界定—效率评价—成因分析—处置研究"这一分析路线,总结城市低效工业用地的科学内涵,梳理城市工业用地利用效率评价的指标体系、评价尺度和评价方法,探寻城市低效工业用地的形成原因,系统分析城市低效工业用地处置的模式和障碍因素,并提出现有研究存在的问题和解决设想。研究表明:(1)城市低效工业用地内涵和基础理论研究需要深入,厘清城市低效工业用地的产生机理、处置动力机制和主体间利益博弈机制是研究的关键;(2)城市低效工业用地效率评价方法选择的科学性有待提高,指标体系的内容应注重对技术创新、环境保护和可持续利用的关注;(3)城市低效工业用地处置模式较为单一,当前大多局限于政府主导的处置模式,如何发挥市场机制在低效工业用地配置中的决定性作用,引导各种主体参与并实现利益共享是研究的重点;(4)城市低效工业用地处置顶层制度供给远落后于地方实践,应尽快总结改革经验,创新顶层制度设计,同时,探索城市低效工业用地处置与新兴产业用地支持政策的融合。

Under the background of supply side structural reform, there has been increasing focus on urban inefficient industrial land. This paper is based on the route of connotative definition—efficiency evaluation—cause analysis—disposal research. We summarize the connotation of inefficient urban industrial land and analyze the index system, scale and methods of efficiency evaluation to explore reasons for the formation of inefficient urban industrial land, disposal modes and obstacles. We found that the connotation and basic theory research into urban inefficient industrial land needs to be further studied to clarify the mechanism of production, disposal mechanism and mechanism of interest game among stakeholders. The scientific method of selecting evaluation methods needs to be improved, the contents of the index system should focus on technological innovation, intellectual property rights, environmental protection and sustainable utilization. The disposal modes of inefficient urban industrial land are relatively unitary, and most of them are limited to the government-led disposal mode. Therefore, future research should focus on how to give full play to the decisive role of market mechanisms in the allocation of inefficient industrial land, guide all kinds of subjects to participate in and realize benefit sharing. The supply of top-level institutions for urban inefficient industrial land is far behind local practice. Therefore,the reform experience should be summarized, top-level institutional design should be innovative;we need to integrate the disposal of urban inefficient industrial land and support emerging industry land policy.