期刊文献+

Source apportionment of PM10 in Delhi, India using PCA/APCS, UNMIX and PMF 被引量:8

Source apportionment of PM10 in Delhi, India using PCA/APCS, UNMIX and PMF
原文传递
导出
摘要 Source apportionment of particulate matter (PM10) measurements taken in Delhi, India between January 2013 and June 2014 was carried out using two receptor models, principal component analysis with absolute principal component scores (PCA/APCS) and UNMIX. The results were compared with previous estimates generated using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model to investigate each model's source-apportioning capability. All models used the PM10 chemical composition (organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), water soluble inorganic ions (WSIC), and trace elements) for source apportionment. The average PM10 concentration during the study period was 249.7±103.9 μg/m3 (range: 61.4-584.8 μg/m3). The UNMIX model resolved five sources (soil dust (SD), vehicular emissions (VE), secondary aerosols (SA), a mixed source of biomass burning (BB) and sea salt (SS), and industrial emissions (IE)). The PCA/APCS model also resolved five sources, two of which also included mixed sources (SD, VE, SD+SS, (SA+BB+SS) and 1E). The PMF analysis differentiated seven individual sources (SD, VE, SA, BB, SS, IE, and fossil fuel combustion (FFC)). All models identified the main sources contributing to PM10 emissions and reconfirmed that VE, SA, BB, and SD were the dominant contributors in Delhi. Source apportionment of particulate matter (PM10) measurements taken in Delhi, India between January 2013 and June 2014 was carried out using two receptor models, principal component analysis with absolute principal component scores (PCA/APCS) and UNMIX. The results were compared with previous estimates generated using the positive matrix factorization (PMF) receptor model to investigate each model's source-apportioning capability. All models used the PM10 chemical composition (organic carbon (OC), elemental carbon (EC), water soluble inorganic ions (WSIC), and trace elements) for source apportionment. The average PM10 concentration during the study period was 249.7±103.9 μg/m3 (range: 61.4-584.8 μg/m3). The UNMIX model resolved five sources (soil dust (SD), vehicular emissions (VE), secondary aerosols (SA), a mixed source of biomass burning (BB) and sea salt (SS), and industrial emissions (IE)). The PCA/APCS model also resolved five sources, two of which also included mixed sources (SD, VE, SD+SS, (SA+BB+SS) and 1E). The PMF analysis differentiated seven individual sources (SD, VE, SA, BB, SS, IE, and fossil fuel combustion (FFC)). All models identified the main sources contributing to PM10 emissions and reconfirmed that VE, SA, BB, and SD were the dominant contributors in Delhi.
出处 《Particuology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2018年第2期107-118,共12页 颗粒学报(英文版)
关键词 Receptor model PCA/APCS UNMIX PMF Source apportionment Receptor model PCA/APCS UNMIX PMF Source apportionment
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1T. P. Jones,L. Merolla,R. J. Richard.Correlation between plasmid DNA damage induced by PM_(10) and trace metals in inhalable particulate matters in Beijing air[J].Science China Earth Sciences,2006,49(12):1323-1331. 被引量:7
  • 2陆思华,白郁华,张广山,李湉湉.大气中挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)的人为来源研究[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(5):757-763. 被引量:128
  • 3Changjie Cai,Fuhai Geng,Xuexi Tie,Qiong Yu,Junlin An.Characteristics and source apportionment of VOCs measured in Shanghai, China[J].Atmospheric Environment.2010(38)
  • 4M.S. Callén,M.T. de la Cruz,J.M. López,M.V. Navarro,A.M. Mastral.Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of the PM10 in Zaragoza (Spain)[J].Chemosphere.2009(8)
  • 5Ying Liu,Min Shao,Linlin Fu,Sihua Lu,Limin Zeng,Dagang Tang.Source profiles of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) measured in China: Part I[J].Atmospheric Environment.2008(25)
  • 6Jingchun Duan,Jihua Tan,Liu Yang,Shan Wu,Jimin Hao.Concentration, sources and ozone formation potential of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during ozone episode in Beijing[J].Atmospheric Research.2007(1)
  • 7Yu Song,Wei Dai,Min Shao,Ying Liu,Sihua Lu,William Kuster,Paul Goldan.Comparison of receptor models for source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in Beijing, China[J].Environmental Pollution.2007(1)
  • 8Barbara Barletta,Simone Meinardi,F. Sherwood Rowland,Chuen-Yu Chan,Xinming Wang,Shichun Zou,Lo Yin Chan,Donald R. Blake.Volatile organic compounds in 43 Chinese cities[J].Atmospheric Environment.2005(32)
  • 9Philip K.Hopke.Recent developments in receptor modeling[J].J Chemometrics.2003(5)
  • 10John G. Watson,Judith C. Chow,Eric M. Fujita.Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance[J].Atmospheric Environment.2001(9)

共引文献60

同被引文献99

引证文献8

二级引证文献40

;
使用帮助 返回顶部