期刊文献+

外周血管介入治疗大咯血的临床疗效及安全性分析 被引量:3

Clinical efficacy and safety analysis of peripheral vascular intervention therapy for massive hemoptysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析外周血管介入治疗大咯血的临床疗效及安全性。方法 72例大咯血患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,各36例。对照组患者实施常规治疗,观察组患者实施外周血管介入治疗。比较两组患者的治疗效果和不良反应发生情况。结果观察组患者总有效率为97.22%,高于对照组的80.56%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者不良反应发生率为5.56%,显著低于对照组的50.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对于大咯血患者实施外周血管介入治疗可降低不良反应发生率,提高患者临床治疗效果。 Objective To analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of peripheral vascular intervention therapy for massive hemoptysis. Methods A total of 72 massive hemoptysis patients were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 36 cases in each group. The control group received conventional therapy, and the observation group received peripheral vascular intervention therapy. The treatment effect and occurrence of adverse reactions between the two groups was compared. Results The observation group had higher total effective rate as 97.22% than 80.56% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The observation group had obviously lower incidence of adverse reactions as 5.56% than 50.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Intervention therapy can reduce the incidence of adverse reactions of patients with massive hemoptysis, and improve the clinical treatment effect.
作者 闫志生 耿婷 王恩德 YAN Zhi-sheng;GENG Ting;WANG En-de(Department of Interventional Medicine, Qingdao Eighth People' s Hospital, Qingdao 266100, China)
出处 《中国实用医药》 2018年第17期12-13,共2页 China Practical Medicine
关键词 外周血管 介入治疗 大咯血 临床疗效 安全性 Peripheral vascular Intervention therapy Massive hemoptysis Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

二级参考文献88

共引文献56

同被引文献10

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部