期刊文献+

早期乳腺癌手术方案、循证护理对策对血清VCAM-1水平和远期疗效的影响 被引量:22

Effect of early breast cancer operation plan and evidence-based nursing strategy on serum VCAM-1 level and long-term efficacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨乳腺区段切除联合腋淋巴结清扫术治疗对早期乳腺癌患者血清血管细胞黏附分子(VCAM)-1水平的影响及其远期疗效。方法乳腺癌患者138例,随机分为对照组和观察组,各69例。对照组采用改良乳腺切除根治术联合腋淋巴结清扫,观察组采用肿瘤病灶区域乳腺区段切除联合腋淋巴结清扫。比较两组围术期指标差异,术前及术后1、3、5 d VCAM-1水平;随访2年并比较两组患者生活质量评分,复发、转移率及死亡率,并对生存曲线进行分析。结果观察组手术时间明显长于对照组,住院时间明显短于对照组,术中失血量明显少于对照组(均P<0.05)。两组术后1、3、5 d VCAM-1水平均明显低于术前(P<0.05);两组术后1、3、5 d VCAM-1水平比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组生存质量评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后1、2年的复发率及转移率均低于对照组,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组死亡率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),观察组平均无病生存期(DFS)显著长于对照组(P<0.05)。结论乳腺区段切除联合腋淋巴结清扫术治疗乳腺癌临床疗效显著,能有效降低患者血清VCAM-1水平并提高预后。
出处 《中国老年学杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第12期2859-2861,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gerontology
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.81303096) 河南省中医药科学研究专项课题(No.2013ZY02036)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献82

  • 1杨名添,戎铁华,黄植蕃,曾灿光,龙浩,傅剑华,林鹏,王欣,王思愚,王曦,唐军.可手术乳腺癌6263例临床分析[J].癌症,2005,24(3):327-331. 被引量:46
  • 2张保宁,邵志敏,乔新民,李波,姜军,杨名添,王水,宋三泰,张斌,杨红健.中国乳腺癌保乳治疗的前瞻性多中心研究[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2005,27(11):680-684. 被引量:247
  • 3Mansel RE, Macneill F, Horgan K, et al. Results of a nationaltraining programme in sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer[J]. BrJ Surg,2013,100(5) :654-661.
  • 4Land SR, Kopec JA, Julian TB, et al. Patient-reported outcomesin sentinel node-negative adjuvant breast cancer patients receivingsentinel-node biopsy or axillary dissection : National Surgical Adju-vant Breast and Bowel Project phase III protocol B-32[ J] . J ClinOncol,2010,28(25) :3929-3936.
  • 5Shahpar H,Atieh A,Maryam A, et al. Risk factors of lymph edemain breast cancer patients[J]. Int J Breast Cancer,2013,ID641818.
  • 6The American society of breast surgeons. Performance and practiceguidelines for sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patientshttp://www. breastsurgeons. org/index, php 2013.
  • 7Krag DN, Anderson SJ, Julian TB, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node re-section compared with conventional axillary -lymph -node dissectionin clinically node-negative patients with breast cancer : overall sur-vival findings from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase 3 trial [J].Lancet Oncol,2010,11 (10) :927-933.
  • 8Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chhabra A, et al. Factors affectingfailed lacaiisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsyin breast cancer-results of the ALMANAC validation phase[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat,2006,99(2) :203-208.
  • 9Lyman GH, Kuderer NM, Marcom PK, et al. Sentinel node biop-sy versus axillary lymph node dissection in early-stage breast canc-er :a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. San An-tonio Breast Cancer Symposium, 2010,10 : PD06-09.
  • 10Klar M,Foeldi M,Markert S,et al. Good prediction of the likeli-hood for sentinel lymph node metastasis by using the MSKCC no-mogram in a German breast cancer population [ J] . Ann Surg On-col,2009,16(5) :1136-1142.

共引文献66

同被引文献203

引证文献22

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部