摘要
质性研究近年来在国内逐渐兴起,但其中存在不少误解、误用,也引发不少的质疑。本文首先梳理质性研究的四种范式属性:脉络性、意义性、诠释性和主体性;进而对有关质性研究的四类误解进行回应,提出质性研究并不只是资料收集工具手段;也并非基于个人经验的思辨;更不是简单的资料归纳;亦不适用于量化评估标准。
In recent years, a wave of qualitative research has gradually emerged in China, but it has also brought many misunderstandings, misuses, and questions. The four paradigm attributes of qualitative research, including context, meaning, interpretation, and subjectivity, are reviewed in this article. This article then clarifies and responds to the four misunderstandings of qualitative research: qualitative research should not be taken as means of data collection; should not be based on the speculation of personal experience; should be more than a simple summary of the data; and should not be applied as criteria of quantitative assessment.
作者
宋萑
SONG Huan(Institute of Education and Social Development, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China)
出处
《全球教育展望》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期56-66,共11页
Global Education
基金
北京师范大学研究生院资助"质性研究方法教学与实践"教学研究课题
关键词
质性研究范式属性
数据收集工具
经验思辨
资料归纳
量化标准
Paradigm attributes of qualitative research
Means of data collection
Speculation ofexperience
Summary of data
Quantitative criteria