期刊文献+

强迫选择条件下性别刻板印象对行为信息注意加工的影响:个人理论的调节作用 被引量:1

Effect of Gender Stereotype to Process Stereotype Related Behavioral Information:Moderating of Person Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:考察在强迫选择条件下,个人理论对性别刻板印象相关信息注意加工的调节作用。方法:采用内隐个人理论测验挑选出63名动态论大学生和67名实体论大学生作为被试,通过再认测验考察在强迫选择条件下,个人理论对性别刻板印象相关信息注意加工的调节作用。结果:高认知负荷条件下,实体论者将更多的注意资源分配于与其刻板印象一致信息,而动态论者将更多的注意资源分配于与其刻板印象不一致信息;低认知负荷条件下,实体论者对与其刻板印象一致信息分配了更多的注意资源,但两类被试对与其刻板印象不一致信息及中性信息的注意资源分配均不存在差异。结论:刻板印象对行为信息注意加工的影响确实受到个人理论的调节。 Objective: To explore how person theory affects the attention processing of the gender stereotype-information in condition of experimental forced selection. Methods: Totally 63 incremental theorists and 67 entity theorists undergraduates were recruited by the Implicit Person Theory Measure. Results: Under high cognitive load, entity theorists allocated more attention to consistent information than to inconsistent information, and incremental theorists allocated more attention to inconsistent information than to consistent information; Under low cognitive load, entity theorists allocated more attention to consistent information, and no significant differences were observed for inconsistent information and neutral information between either entity theorists and incremental theorists. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that effect of gender stereotype to process stereotype related behavioral information is moderated by the person theory.
作者 余秋梅 YU Qiu-mei(Department of Teacher Education, Kunming University, Kunming 650214, China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第3期449-453,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
关键词 性别刻板印象 个人理论 注意资源 再认测验 Gender stereotype Person theory Attention resources Recognition paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献166

  • 1连淑芳.刻板印象的自动过程研究新进展[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):41-44. 被引量:13
  • 2李晓庆,权朝鲁.刻板印象对印象形成过程中信息加工的影响[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):598-601. 被引量:9
  • 3廖全明,黄希庭.自发特质推理研究的回顾与展望[J].西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,32(6):11-14. 被引量:11
  • 4Akrami,. N., Ekehammar, B., & Araya, T. (2006). Category and stereotype activation revisited. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 47, 513-522.
  • 5Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136-141.
  • 6Bargh, J, A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition: Vol. 1. Basic processes (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, N J: Erlbaum.
  • 7Bargh, J. A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449.
  • 8Belmore, S. M. (1987). Determinants of attention during impression formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 480-489.
  • 9Carlston, D. E., &Mae, L. (2007). Posing with the flag: Trait-specific effects of symbols on person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 241-248.
  • 10Crawford, M. T., Skowronski, J. J., & Stiff, C. (2007). Limiting the spread of spontaneous trait transference. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 466-472.

共引文献22

同被引文献32

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部